BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SB 1384
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 1384 (Mitchell)
          As Amended July 2, 2014
          Majority vote

           SENATE VOTE  :23-12  
           
           HEALTH              10-6        APPROPRIATIONS      12-5        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Pan, Bonilla, Bonta,      |Ayes:|Gatto, Bocanegra,         |
          |     |Chesbro, Gonzalez, Roger  |     |Bradford,                 |
          |     |Hern�ndez, Lowenthal,     |     |Ian Calderon, Campos,     |
          |     |Nazarian,                 |     |Eggman, Gomez, Holden,    |
          |     |Ridley-Thomas, Wieckowski |     |Pan, Quirk,               |
          |     |                          |     |Ridley-Thomas, Weber      |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Maienschein, Ch�vez,      |Nays:|Bigelow, Donnelly, Jones, |
          |     |Mansoor, Waldron,         |     |Linder, Wagner            |
          |     |Patterson, Wagner         |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY :  Deletes the requirement that the Department of Public  
          Health (DPH)  automatically deny a training and examination  
          application and deny, suspend, or revoke a certificate if the  
          applicant or certificate holder has been convicted of a  
          violation or attempted violation of one or more specified  
          crimes.  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Eliminates the provisions of law that require DPH, except  
            under specified circumstances, to deny, suspend, or revoke a  
            certificate as a certified nurse assistant (CNA) if the  
            applicant or certificate holder has been convicted of one of a  
            number of specified criminal offenses, including murder,  
            robbery, assault, kidnapping, various sexual offenses, elder  
            or dependent abuse, various larceny and extortion offenses,  
            and others.

          2)Limits DPH's discretion to determine whether an applicant has  
            adequately demonstrated rehabilitation, for purposes of  
            denying, suspending, or revoking a certificate as a CNA based  
            on the conviction of a crime related to the qualifications,  
            functions, and duties of a CNA, by adding an order from a  
            superior court relating to the dismissal or setting aside of  








                                                                  SB 1384
                                                                  Page  2


            criminal convictions to the list of factors that are evidence  
            of rehabilitation.  Deletes the ability of DPH to disregard  
            these orders when determining whether an applicant has  
            adequately demonstrated rehabilitation.

          3)Makes other technical and conforming changes, and various  
            findings and declarations regarding reducing recidivism.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, potential minor one-time costs to DPH to modify  
          processes and train staff on new procedures for evaluating  
          criminal convictions (Licensing and Certification Fund).

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, current law mandates denial  
          of CNA applicants who have been convicted of certain enumerated  
          offenses, regardless of the passage of time or an applicant's  
          transformation and this automatic bar unfairly denies  
          rehabilitated people necessary access to a growing industry of  
          accessible, living-wage jobs.  The author states that it also  
          ignores evidence-based information showing that the likelihood  
          of recidivism declines over time to a level near or equal to a  
          person who has never been arrested.  The author argues that this  
          bill provides all CNA applicants with a conviction history  
          discretionary review of their application and consideration of  
          all evidence of rehabilitation-thereby modeling the provisions  
          that apply to registered nurses.  Finally, the author states  
          that this common sense measure protects public safety by  
          preserving the discretion to deny an application on the basis of  
          a conviction, and it more aptly reflects California's commitment  
          to increasing opportunities for rehabilitated people who seek to  
          earn a living wage, support their family, and contribute to  
          society.

          Equal Rights Advocates is the sponsor of this bill and writes  
          that categorically banning individuals from becoming CNA's  
          solely on the basis of a past conviction denies many families a  
          real chance to climb out of poverty.  The sponsor further argues  
          that studies show that the passage of time substantially reduces  
          the likelihood of recidivism to a level near or equal to those  
          who have never been arrested and that stable employment  
          decreases the likelihood of recidivism by as much as 62%.   
          Finally, the sponsors state that California's commitment to  
          reducing recidivism must include measures that increase access  
          to living wage jobs for those with criminal records.








                                                                  SB 1384
                                                                  Page  3



          DPH opposes this bill, stating this bill removes its ability to  
          adequately protect patients, and that an administrative remedy  
          exists for individuals who obtain a Certificate of  
          Rehabilitation or whose charges are dismissed.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Lara Flynn / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097 


                                                                FN: 0004418