BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SB 1391
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   August 6, 2014

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                   SB 1391 (Hancock) - As Amended:  August 4, 2014 

          Policy Committee:                             Higher  
          EducationVote:12-1

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:               

           SUMMARY  

          This bill allows California Community Colleges (CCCs) to receive  
          full funding for credit-course instruction offered in  
          correctional institutions and seeks to expand the offering of  
          such courses.  Specifically, this bill:

             1)   Waives "open course" provisions for community college  
               courses offered in state correctional facilities, thus  
               conforming to current allowances for CCC courses in local  
               or federal correctional facilities, for which the colleges  
               receive funding even though the courses are not open to the  
               general public. 

             2)   Allows attendance hours generated by credit courses at  
                all  correctional facilities to be funded at the  
               corresponding rates for those types of courses rather than  
               at the lower, non-credit rate.

             3)   Prohibits districts from claiming state apportionments  
               for instruction in correctional facilities if the district  
               is fully compensated by another entity for the costs of  
               direct instructional services, and requires districts to  
               deduct any partial compensation for correctional facility  
               education from their apportionment.

             4)   Requires CDCR and the CCC Chancellor's Office, by March  
               1, 2015, to enter into an interagency agreement to expand  
               access to courses leading to degrees, certifications, or  
               transfer to four-year degrees. Courses are to supplement,  
               not supplant adult education courses offered by CDCR's  
               Office of Correctional Education.








                                                                  SB 1391
                                                                  Page  2


             5)   Requires CDCR and the Chancellor's Office to develop  
               metrics for evaluating the success of (4) and report their  
               findings to Legislature and the Governor by July 31, 2018.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)Ongoing General Fund (Prop. 98) cost pressure for converting  
            qualified existing courses to the full credit rate at local  
            and federal institutions.

            Currently, credit funding per FTES is $4,636, career  
            development and college preparation course funding is $3,283,  
            and non-credit funding is $2,788.  According to the CCC  
            Chancellor's Office, in 2006-07 (most recent data available)  
            districts provided credit courses for 1,769 FTES in local and  
            federal correctional facilities. The majority (1,588 FTES)  
            already received full credit funding as distance education  
            courses open to the public.  Under this bill, the remaining  
            FTES (181) would have received full credit apportionment at a  
            cost of $335,000.

            In addition to the above costs for existing courses, the  
            higher funding rates could result in increased course  
            offerings at local and federal facilities, with resulting  
            state costs.

          2)Additional costs would depend on the number of FTEs taking  
            classes in state correctional facilities. For every 100  
            for-credit FTEs, annual GF (Prop. 98) costs would increase by  
            $464,000.  Community colleges are limited to enrollment caps  
            that arguably would make this a zero sum change, but not all  
            colleges are at their caps, thus expanding access and funding  
            rates creates enrollment and funding pressure.

          3)Costs for CDCR and the CCC to enter into the interagency  
            agreement should be absorbable. One-time costs to develop  
            metrics, conduct and evaluation and provide the required  
            report should not exceed $200,000.

          4)To the extent this bill leads to increased education  
            programming for inmates, the state and local governments could  
            realize unquantifiable savings associated with decreased  
            recidivism.









                                                                  SB 1391
                                                                  Page  3

           COMMENTS 

           1)Purpose  . A 2013 study by the Rand Corporation, "Evaluating the  
            Effectiveness of Correctional Education" noted a common thread  
            among instructional delivery methods is that programs with  
            courses taught by college instructors, taught by instructors  
            external to the correctional facility, and that have a  
            post-release component can connect inmates both directly and  
            indirectly with the outside community.  In addition, college  
            instructors and instructors external to the correctional  
            facility can potentially infuse the program with approaches,  
            exercises, and standards being used in more traditional  
            instructional settings. Programs with post-release components  
            can provide continuity of support that can assist inmates as  
            they continue on in education and/or enter the workforce in  
            the months immediately after they are released. This bill  
            makes two changes regarding inmate education.

            Current law prohibits CCCs from claiming state funding for  
            classes that are not open to the public, however, an exemption  
            is allowed for inmate education in city, county and federal  
            correctional facilities, with funding provided at non-credit  
            rates.  State funding under this exemption is not allowed for  
            CCC classes in state correctional facilities. This bill  
            extends the open course exemption to CCC classes in state  
            facilities and allows for funding of credit courses in all  
            correctional facilities at the higher rate established for  
            such courses.

           2)Related Legislation  . The 2014-15 Budget Act includes a $2  
            million allocation from the Recidivism Reduction Fund for  
            one-time grants for community colleges to provide coursework  
            geared toward improving inmates' ability to find employment  
            upon release.

            As passed by this committee in January, AB 1271 (Bonta)  
            contained almost identical provisions as this bill with regard  
            to allowing full funding for CCC courses in state correctional  
            facilities. AB 1271 has been amended in the Senate to address  
            a different subject.
           
          3)Prior Legislation  .  In 2011, AB 216 (Swanson), which was  
            virtually identical to AB 1271, passed the Assembly but was  
            amended in the Senate to address a different topic. In 2010,  
            AB 1702 (Swanson) and in 2009, SB 574 (Hancock), also  








                                                                  SB 1391
                                                                  Page  4

            virtually identical bills, were both held on Suspense in  
            Senate Appropriations. In 2008, SB 413 (Scott), also  
            substantially similar, was vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger,  
            who argued that the bill "appears to create inappropriate  
            fiscal incentives for community colleges, state prisons, local  
            correctional agencies, and other contracting entities that may  
            lead to supplanting current funding provided through the  
            California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation."

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081