SB 1396,
as amended, Hancock. School climate:begin delete Schoolwide Positive Behavior Intervention and Supportend deletebegin insert multitiered intervention and supportend insert program.
Existing law establishes a system of public elementary and secondary schools in this state, and authorizes local educational agencies throughout the state to provide instruction to pupils.
This bill would establishbegin delete the Schoolwide Positive Behavior Intervention and Supportend deletebegin insert a multitiered intervention and supportend insert program. The bill, to the extent that one-time funding is made available in the Budget Act of 2014, would require the State Department of Education to apportion funds to a designated county office of education, selected from applicant county offices of education, that would be the fiduciary agent for the program. The bill would require the designated
county office of education to consult with specified organizations and target the funding towards a statewide professional development effort that would provide training inbegin delete schoolwide positive behavior and supportend deletebegin insert multitiered intervention and supportend insert to school personnel.
The bill would require the Legislative Analyst’s Office to review the impacts of this professional development effort and report to the Governorbegin insert, the State Department of Education,end insert and the Legislature by June 30,begin delete 2016,end deletebegin insert 2017,end insert
on specified aspects of the program.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:
3(a) In many school districts, local policies have addressed safety
4and mental health issues in schools with ad hoc and piecemeal
5strategies. This is borne out by the very narrow federal and state
6laws related to pupil suspension and expulsion that produced
7reactive discipline policies and increased pupil exclusion from
8school. These practices have resulted in disproportionality in
9discipline practices, as reflected in the high number of suspensions
10and expulsions among African American and Latino pupils in
11California.
12(b) Restorative
justice or restorative practices is a set of
13principles and practices grounded in the values of showing respect,
14taking responsibility, and strengthening relationships. Restorative
15justice focuses on repair of harm and prevention of reoccurrence.
16Restorative practices, applied in a schoolwide context, are used
17to build a sense of school community and resolve conflict by
18repairing harm and restoring positive relationships where pupils
19and educators work together to set academic goals, develop core
20values for the classroom, and resolve conflicts. Restorative
21practices can be incorporated in the tiered framework of
22schoolwide positive behavior interventions and supports.
23(b)
end delete
24begin insert(c)end insert Recent statistics indicate that 20 percent of schoolage youth
25experience a functional or significant behavior or mental health
26disorder. In contrast, less than 1 percent of pupils are identified to
27receive mental health services through the special education
28classification of emotional disturbance. These numbers suggest a
29significant gap in the need for school-based prevention and
30intervention behavioral health services. Schoolwide Positive
31Behavior Intervention and Support (SW--PBIS) can fill this gap
32by providing a comprehensive and collaborative prevention and
33intervention framework for schools to improve academic and
P3 1behavioral outcomes for all pupils. Recent research from Orange
2County has shown that in districts where SW--PBIS has been
3implemented there has been a 26-percent drop in in-school
4suspensions, a 55-percent drop in out-of-school suspensions, and
5a 30-percent drop in expulsions.
6(c)
end delete
7begin insert(d)end insert In order to ensure that all pupils flourish academically,
8districts must establish equitable discipline practices and behavioral
9interventions that promote positive social-emotional development
10and that prevent and respond to negative behaviors in order to
11reengage disconnected pupils. School psychologists play a critical
12role in implementing school-based educationally related counseling
13services and positive behavior systems and supports that create
14and reinforce positive school cultures of achievement for all pupils,
15including those at risk of academic failure.
16(d)
end delete
17begin insert(e)end insert The local control funding formula has been passed in an
18effort to reform school finance and to direct funding directly to
19at-risk pupil populations as outlined in Section 42238.07 of the
20Education Code. This section states that the regulations shall
21require a school district “to increase or improve services for
22unduplicated pupils.” Research shows that efforts to improve
23school climate, safety, and learning are not separate endeavors.
24They must be designed, funded, and implemented as a
25comprehensive schoolwide approach. School districts must work
26to ensure through their local control and accountability plans that
27pupils have access to universal, targeted, and individualized
28psychological, behavioral, and counseling services and support
29that will increase their chances for academic improvement.
30(e)
end delete
31begin insert(f)end insert SW--PBIS is a multitiered framework for creating positive
32school cultures. SW--PBIS is a decisionmaking framework that
33guides selection, integration, and implementation of the best
34evidence-based academic and behavioral practices for improving
35important academic and behavior outcomes for all pupils. The
36SW--PBIS approach requires the implementation of preventative
37and proactive approaches to discipline and positive discipline
38methods. In doing so, SW--PBIS changes the belief systems and
39behavior of school staffs, pupils, and the community, resulting in
40positive, productive citizens, and safer schools.
P4 1(f)
end delete
2begin insert(g)end insert SW--PBIS can support important local control and
3accountability plan priority areas by providing local schools and
4districts with an evidence-based framework to produce targeted
5pupil behavioral and academic outcomes. SW--PBIS provides an
6operational framework for achieving these outcomes.
7(g)
end delete
8begin insert(h)end insert SW--PBIS fosters local control for school climate,
9academics, and behavior. SW--PBIS provides an operational
10framework and a set of sustainable schoolwide practices for
11achieving these outcomes. The schoolwide practices are
12research-based, but are developed and implemented by the local
13school team of teachers, parents, administrators, school
14psychologists, school
counselors, and pupils to reflect the culture
15and values of their schools.
16(h)
end delete
17begin insert(i)end insert SW--PBIS has national support and has been defined,
18described, and researched since its introduction in the
19reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
20of 1997. SW--PBIS research and training is supported by the
21Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP), United States
22Department of Education, through the OSEP Technical Assistance
23Center. School psychologists have been leaders in SW--PBIS
24professional development and systems implementation in schools
25and districts throughout the state.
26(i)
end delete27begin insert(j)end insert (1) SW--PBIS emphasizes four integrated elements:
28(A) Data for decisionmaking.
29(B) Measurable outcomes supported and evaluated by data.
30(C) Practices with evidence that these outcomes are achievable.
31(D) Systems that efficiently and effectively support
32implementation of these practices.
33(2) These four elements are guided by six core principles, as
34follows:
35(A) Develop a continuum of scientifically based behavior and
36academic
interventions and supports.
37(B) Use data to make decisions and solve problems.
38(C) Arrange the environment to prevent the development and
39occurrence of problem behavior; increase supervision where
40needed.
P5 1(D) All school staff teach and encourage prosocial skills and
2behaviors in all settings on campus, and before and after school.
3(E) Implement evidence-based behavioral practices with fidelity
4and accountability.
5(F) Screen universally and monitor pupil performance and
6progress continuously.
7(j)
end delete
8begin insert(k)end insert Schools that have established and maintained SW--PBIS
9systems with integrity have teaching and learning environments
10that are less reactive, aversive, punitive, dangerous, and
11exclusionary, are more engaging, responsive, preventive,
12productive, and participatory, address classroom management and
13disciplinary issues such as attendance, cooperation, participation,
14and meeting positive expectations, improve support for pupils
15whose behavior requires more specialized or intensive assistance
16for emotional and behavioral disorders and mental health issues,
17and maximize academic engagement and achievement for all
18pupils.
Chapter 19 (commencing with Section 53330) is added
20to Part 28 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Education Code, to read:
21
(a) To the extent that one-time funding is made
26available in the Budget Act of 2014, the department shall apportion
27funds to a designated county office of education to be the fiduciary
28agent forbegin insert a multitiered intervention and support program that
29includes, but is not limited to,end insert the Schoolwide Positive Behavior
30Intervention and Supportbegin delete (SW-PBIS)end delete program. The designated
31county office of education shall be chosen by the Superintendent
32from county offices that apply for designation under this chapter.
33The designated county office of education shall be in charge of
34establishing specific professional development activities
that will
35lead to statewide professional development support structures
36allowing for the development and expansion ofbegin delete SW-PBISend delete
37begin insert multitiered intervention and supportend insert efforts in each region of the
38state.
39(b) This professional development and outreach effort shall
40build upon existing statewide organizations, networks, and regional
P6 1organizations that are providing services related tobegin delete SW-PBISend delete
2begin insert multitiered intervention and supportend insert and other mental health
3approaches. The goal would be to organizebegin delete SW-PBISend deletebegin insert
multitiered
4intervention and supportend insert trainings and resources to be disseminated
5on a regional basis. These trainings, associated materials, and
6research shall educate participants on how to havebegin delete SW-PBISend delete
7begin insert multitiered intervention and support programend insert support local control
8and accountability plan strategic goals in alignment with a
9multitiered support system framework.
10(c) The designated county office of education shall consult with
11thebegin insert Regionalend insert K--12 Student Mental Health Initiative, the National
12Alliance on Mental Health Illness, the California Technical
13Assistance Center onbegin delete SW-PBIS,end deletebegin insert
Schoolwide Positive Behavior
14Intervention and Support,end insert the California County Superintendents
15Educational Services Association, the California Mental Health
16Directors Association, the United Advocates for Children and
17Families, and other nonprofit agencies throughout the state. The
18designated county office of education shall also select an advisory
19committee made up of stakeholders and mental health professionals
20who have participated in the development and expansion of
21begin delete SW-PBISend deletebegin insert multitiered intervention and supportend insert programs to assist
22in the planning and implementation of this project.
23(d) The designated county office of education, in
the
24implementation of this chapter, shall consider and include, as
25appropriate, available resources for multitiered intervention and
26support.
27(d)
end delete
28begin insert(e)end insert Within the context of a state-level plan, funding shall be
29targeted to all of the following critical activities:
30(1) Explaining the importance of linkingbegin delete SW-PBISend deletebegin insert
multitiered
31intervention and supportend insert efforts with local control funding formula
32planning.
33(2) Creating broad exposure tobegin delete SW-PBIS,end deletebegin insert multitiered
34intervention and support,end insert which would include pamphlets, videos,
35Internet Web site creation, webinars, and newsletters.
36(3) Creating regional conferences onbegin delete SW-PBISend deletebegin insert multitiered
37intervention and supportend insert implementation that would provide free
38training for teachers, school psychologists, and administrators.
39(4) Establishing stipends for release time for school personnel
40attending these workshops.
P7 1(5) Developing best practices of current district levelbegin delete SW-PBISend delete
2begin insert multitiered intervention and support end insertsystemsbegin insert based on the analysis
3pursuant to subdivision (f)end insert and ensure that these best practices are
4widely disseminated.
5(6) Establishing a cohort of trainers that can be available to
6work directly with local school districts seeking to implement
7begin delete SW-PBISend deletebegin insert
multitiered intervention and support programsend insert.
8(7) Establishing a repository for the collection and dissemination
9ofbegin delete SW-PBISend deletebegin insert multitiered intervention and supportend insert best practices.
10(e)
end delete
11begin insert(f)end insert The designated county office of education, working in
12cooperation with the Department of Finance, the State Department
13of Education, and the Legislative Analyst, shall analyze the relevant
14data on
the success ofbegin delete SW-PBISend deletebegin insert multitiered intervention and
15support programsend insert at both the state and national levels, and shall
16establish a set of best practices to be made available to school
17districts and consortia ofbegin insert schoolend insert districts to expandbegin delete current mental begin insert
schoolwide multitiered intervention and
18health programs and to use as the foundation of addressing school
19discipline issues including school violence, suspensions,
20expulsions, and bullying.end delete
21supports to address academic and behavioral issues and to use as
22a foundation for the annual goals and state priorities, such as
23pupil engagement and school climate, to be included in local
24control and accountability plans.end insert
25(f)
end delete
26begin insert(g)end insert The Legislative Analyst’s Office shall review the impacts
27of this professional development effort and shall report to the
28begin delete Governorend deletebegin insert
Governor, the State Department of Education,end insert and the
29Legislature by June 30,begin delete 2016,end deletebegin insert 2017,end insert on the breadth and best
30practices of the training.
O
98