BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       SB 1402|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 1402
          Author:   De León (D)
          Amended:  4/10/14
          Vote:     27

           
           SENATE ELECTIONS & CONSTITUTIONAL AMEND. COMM.  :  5-0, 4/22/14
          AYES:  Torres, Anderson, Hancock, Jackson, Padilla

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8


           SUBJECT  :    Political Reform Act of 1974:  campaign funds

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill prohibits a spouse or domestic partner of  
          an elected officer or a candidate for elective office from  
          receiving, in exchange for services rendered, compensation from  
          campaign funds held by a controlled committee of the elected  
          officer or candidate for elective office.   

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law:

          1.Prohibits, pursuant to the Political Reform Act (PRA), a  
            spouse or domestic partner of an elected officer or a  
            candidate for elective office from receiving compensation from  
            campaign funds held by a controlled committee of the elected  
            officer or candidate for elective office for services rendered  
            in connection with fundraising for the benefit of the elected  
            officer or candidate for elective office.

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    SB 1402
                                                                     Page  
          2

          2.Prohibits the use of campaign funds for an expenditure that  
            confers a substantial personal benefit on any individual or  
            individuals with authority to approve the expenditure unless  
            the expenditure is directly related to a political,  
            legislative, or governmental purpose.

          3.Prohibits the use of campaign funds to compensate a candidate  
            or elected officer for the performance of political,  
            legislative, or governmental activities, except for  
            reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incurred for  
            political, legislative, or governmental purposes.

          This bill prohibits a spouse or domestic partner of an elected  
          officer or a candidate for elective office from receiving, in  
          exchange for services rendered, compensation from campaign funds  
          held by a controlled committee of the elected officer or  
          candidate for elective office.   

           Background
           
           Compensating spouses  .  Candidates and officeholders both within  
          and outside of California often find themselves the subject of  
          scrutiny and controversy for paying a spouse or other family  
          member for professional services rendered to, and paid by, their  
          campaign committees.  

          Consequently, the Legislature passed and Governor Schwarzenegger  
          signed 
          SB 739 (Strickland, Chapter 360, Statutes of 2009) which  
          prohibits a spouse or domestic partner of an elected officer or  
          a candidate for elective office from receiving compensation from  
          campaign funds held by a controlled committee of the elected  
          officer or candidate for services rendered in connection with  
          fundraising for the benefit of the officeholder or candidate.  

          However, ethical concerns continue to come up because existing  
          law allows a candidate or officeholder to pay a spouse for  
          services other than fundraising services that are rendered to,  
          and paid by, the campaign.  Under California's community  
          property laws, any income earned by a married person while  
          living with his/her spouse generally is considered to be  
          community property, which is jointly held by both spouses.  As a  
          result, when a candidate pays his/her spouse for professional  
          services rendered to the candidate's campaign committee, the  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    SB 1402
                                                                     Page  
          3

          campaign committee's payment indirectly becomes the candidate's  
          personal property.  These arrangements are controversial because  
          they allow candidates to personally benefit from the  
          contributions that their campaigns seek and accept.  Under such  
          circumstances, a candidate or officeholder can personally  
          benefit financially from contributions received by his/her  
          campaign.  

          California law already recognizes that ethical concerns may  
          arise when a candidate can personally benefit financially from  
          contributions received by his/her campaign.  For that reason,  
          the PRA prohibits campaign funds from being used to compensate a  
          candidate or elected officer for the performance of political,  
          legislative, or governmental activities, except for  
          reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incurred for political,  
          legislative, or governmental purposes.  Along the same lines,  
          the PRA limits the amount of money that a candidate may loan to  
          his/her own campaign.  Those limits were put into place due to  
          concerns that money raised by a candidate subsequent to an  
          election to repay that candidate's personal loan to his/her  
          campaign committee would go into the candidate's own pocket,  
          indirectly resulting in campaign contributions becoming a  
          candidate's personal funds.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  5/2/14)

          League of Women Voters of California

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author's office, the  
          PRA sets specific limits on the use of campaign funds by  
          candidates and elected officials, markedly by prohibiting the  
          use of campaign funds for gifts or personal purposes.  The  
          spirit of the law is clear-candidates and elected officials  
          should not personally profit from their campaign coffers.   
          Compensation from campaign funds is limited to reimbursement for  
          out-of-pocket expenses incurred specifically for political,  
          legislative, or governmental purposes.

          However, under existing law, a spouse or domestic partner of an  
          elected official or a candidate can receive compensation for  
          providing services to a campaign, so long as they are not  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    SB 1402
                                                                     Page  
          4

          fundraising services.  This raises ethical questions about a  
          candidate or officeholder's ability to benefit financially from  
          contributions made to his/her campaign given that under  
          community property law, campaign funds received by a  
          spouse/domestic partner as payment would be considered jointly  
          owned and equally shared with the candidate/elected officer.

          This bill will strengthen the PRA by prohibiting spouses or  
          domestic partners from receiving compensation from campaign  
          funds for any services rendered to a campaign.

          RM:k  5/2/14   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****





























                                                                CONTINUED