BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �






           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE       BILL NO:  sb 1418
          SENATOR MARK DESAULNIER, CHAIRMAN              AUTHOR:   desaulnier
                                                         VERSION:  3/27/14
          Analysis by:  Carrie Cornwell                  FISCAL:   yes
          Hearing date:  April 29, 2014                                
          URGENCY:   YES



          SUBJECT:

          Vehicle weight fees:  transportation bond debt service

          DESCRIPTION:

          This bill redirects vehicle weight fee revenues from paying debt  
          service on transportation-related, general obligation bonds to  
          repairing and maintaining streets and highways.

          ANALYSIS:

          Periodically, the state issues general obligation bonds to  
          finance transportation-related infrastructure development and  
          repair.  For example, the Legislature placed Proposition 1B, the  
          Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port  
          Security Bond Act, on the November 7, 2006 ballot, through which  
          voters authorized the issuance of $19.925 billion in general  
          obligation bonds.  Typically, the state pays the debt service on  
          general obligation bonds from the General Fund, including on  
          transportation-related bonds until 2010.
          
          In March 2010, the Legislature passed and Governor  
          Schwarzenegger signed ABX8 6, Chapter 11, Statutes of 2009-10,  
          commonly known as the gas tax swap, to help the state address  
          its then-massive General Fund deficit.  The gas tax swap  
          provided approximately $1 billion annually in General Fund  
          relief by funding debt service on transportation-related,  
          general obligation bonds from new gas tax revenues.  These new  
          gas tax revenues came about when, effective July 1, 2010, ABX8 6  
          eliminated the sales tax on gasoline and replaced it with an  
          increase in the gasoline excise tax designed to generate an  
          equivalent amount of revenue.   While no additional revenue was  
          created, less money went to current transportation spending  
          through the State Highway Account and instead went to the  
          General Fund to pay debt service on transportation bonds. 





          SB 1418 (DESAULNIER)                                   Page 2

                                                                       


          Later in 2010, the people passed on the November ballot  
          Proposition 22, which, among other things, effectively precludes  
          the Legislature from directing gas excise tax funds to pay debt  
          service on previously issued bonds, thus undoing the General  
          Fund-savings provision of the 2010 gas tax swap. 

          In response, the Legislature again passed and the governor again  
          signed the gas tax swap as 
          AB 105, Chapter 6, Statutes of 2011.  Instead of new gas tax  
          revenues, AB 105 directs vehicle weight fee revenues, which are  
          imposed on commercial vehicles and total nearly a billion  
          dollars a year, to paying transportation-related, general  
          obligation bond debt service.  AB 105 directed revenue from the  
          new gas tax to backfill the State Highway Account for the lost  
          vehicle weight fee revenues and then provides the remaining  
          revenue to local street and road projects and to state highway  
          projects.

          Last year's transportation budget trailer bill, SB 85, Chapter  
          35, Statutes of 2013, created authority for a new class of  
          transportation general obligation bonds known as designated  
          bonds, which are secured by a transfer of vehicle weight fee  
          revenue to the Transportation Debt Service Fund for the purpose  
          of directly paying the debt service on the designated bonds,  
          rather than paying debt service indirectly through reimbursement  
          to the General Fund.  To the extent the transferred vehicle  
          weight fees are insufficient to meet the debt service  
          requirement, the General Fund would make up the shortfall.  The  
          state has never issued designated bonds under this authority.

           This bill  :

          1.Directs vehicle weight fees into the State Highway Account,  
            rather than the Transportation Debt Service Fund, thereby  
            providing an additional $1 billion annually to local streets  
            and roads and to the state highway system.  Thus, General Fund  
            revenues must service the transportation-related, general  
            obligation bond debt of the state.    

          2.Deletes the provisions of last year's transportation budget  
            trailer bill that created authority to issue designated bonds  
            secured by weight fees.

          3.Is an urgency measure that takes effect on July 1, 2014,  
            should it be enacted on or before that date.
          




          SB 1418 (DESAULNIER)                                   Page 3

                                                                       


          COMMENTS:

           1.Purpose  .  The author notes that during the prolonged state  
            budget crisis, the state used vehicle weight fee money to help  
            offset its General Fund obligations by paying for debt service  
            on transportation-related, general obligation bonds.  Now that  
            the state budget is recovering, he states that it is time to  
            put this funding back to work on our transportation system  
            where it is badly needed.  

            Speaking to that need, proponents cite recent assessments of  
            the need for repair and maintenance of state and local roads.   
            For example, the League of California Cities and the  
            California State Association of Counties have commissioned  
            periodic assessments of local streets and roads repair needs.   
            Their most recent assessment found that the pavement condition  
            on the local transportation network is deteriorating at an  
            accelerating rate such that without reinvestment in that  
            system, 25 percent of local roads will be in a failed  
            condition by 2022.  This needs assessment shows that local  
            governments in California are short about $8 billion a year  
            for the next decade to maintain the local road system.   
            Similarly, the California Transportation Commission's  
            statewide transportation needs assessment shows that each  
            year, the state is short several billion dollars necessary to  
            maintain and rehabilitate the state highway system.

            The author introduced this bill to put nearly $1 billion each  
            year back into the repair and maintenance of our state's road  
            system.  This amount is clearly far short of the need, but can  
            provide some relief without raising taxes.

           2.Technical amendment  .   On page 12, line 19, correct an  
            outdated reference to a provision of the California  
            Constitution by deleting "Section 1" and inserting "Section  
            2".     
             
          RELATED LEGISLATION:

          AB 2651 (Linder) prohibits vehicle weight fee revenue from being  
          used to pay the debt service on transportation-related, general  
          obligation bonds.  Held in the Assembly Transportation  
          Committee.

          AB 2728 (Perea and Linder) prohibits the use of vehicle weight  
          fee revenue to pay debt service on transportation-related,  




          SB 1418 (DESAULNIER)                                   Page 4

                                                                       


          general obligation bonds until January 1, 2019.  Passed the  
          Assembly Transportation Committee on April 21 by a 15-0 vote.   
          Currently awaiting hearing in the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee.
          
          POSITIONS:  (Communicated to the committee before noon on  
          Wednesday,                                             April 23,  
          2014.)

               SUPPORT:  Transportation California (sponsor)
                         Automobile Club of Southern California
                         California Alliance for Jobs
                         League of California Cities
                         Northern California Carpenters Regional Council
                         Southern California Contractors Association
                         United Contractors
                         Vulcan Materials Company

               OPPOSED:  None received.