BILL ANALYSIS �
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| |
| SENATE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES AND WATER |
| Senator Fran Pavley, Chair |
| 2013-2014 Regular Session |
| |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
BILL NO: SB 1420 HEARING DATE: April 29, 2014
AUTHOR: Wolk URGENCY: No
VERSION: April 21, 2014 CONSULTANT: Dennis O'Connor
DUAL REFERRAL: No FISCAL: Yes
SUBJECT: Water management: urban water management plans.
BACKGROUND AND EXISTING LAW
Under the Urban Water Management Planning Act (Act), all urban
water suppliers are required to prepare and adopt an urban water
management plan. Updated every five years, the plans include,
among other things, a description of the service area of the
supplier, the identity and quantity of water resources, and
water use projections. Urban water management plans (UWMPs)
help inform the public about the water challenges faced by their
local water supplier, the suppliers' plans for addressing those
challenges, and are the basis for making water availability
determinations under the "show us the water" statutes (SBs 610 &
221 of 2001). Compliance with the Act is a requirement to
receive state funding.
AB 1420 (Laird/2007), among other things, required the
Department of Water Resources (DWR) to convene an independent
technical panel (ITP) to provide information and recommendations
to the department and the Legislature on new demand management
measures, technologies, and approaches. The panel was to be
convened by January 1, 2009, and is required to report to the
Legislature no later than January 1, 2010, and every five years
thereafter.
In February 2014, the ITP issued its Report to the Legislature
on Urban Water Management Plan Demand Management Measures
Reporting and Requirements. The Report made five
recommendations for improving UWMPs.
#1:Amend the Urban Water Management Planning Act to Simplify and
Update the Demand Management Measure Reporting Requirements.
#2:Require Distribution System Water Loss Reporting in Urban
1
Water Management Plans.
#3:Authorize the Department of Water Resources to Require
Electronic Filing of Urban Water Management Plans, Including
Standardized Forms.
#4:Voluntary Reporting on Projected Water Savings from Codes,
Standards, Ordinances and Transportation and Land Use Plans
Affecting an Urban Water Supplier's Service Area.
#5:Voluntary Inclusion of Energy Intensity in Urban Water
Management Plans.
PROPOSED LAW
This bill would,
Require distribution system water loss reporting in UWMPs.
Authorize DWR to require electronic filing of UWMPs.
Explicitly authorize voluntary reporting on projected water
savings from codes, standards, ordinances, or transportation
and land use plans affecting an urban water supplier's service
area.
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT
According to East Bay Municipal Utility District, SB 1420 "is
intended to enact three recommendations made by the Department
of Water Resources Independent Technical Panel on Demand
management Measures ? By requiring urban water suppliers to
report on distribution system water loss, providing for
electronic submission of UWMPs, and ensuring water suppliers
have the ability to capture and report on water savings from
compliance with codes, SB 1420 would improve the process for
filing UWMPs and update the information they contain to reflect
changing approaches to managing water supply reliability."
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: None
COMMENTS
Related Measures
SB 1036 (Pavley) - would explicitly authorize the voluntary
energy reporting changes to the Urban Water Management
Planning Act recommended by the ITP.
AB 2067 (Weber) - would change the reporting requirements for
demand management measures in UWMPs as recommended by the ITP.
AB 2725 (Brown) - would require the description of the water
demand management measure in urban water management plans to
include a description of an urban waterway restoration
program.
2
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS: None
SUPPORT
California Municipal Utilities Association
East Bay Municipal Utility District
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Natural Resources Defense Council
Office of Ratepayer Advocates, California Public Utilities
Commission
OPPOSITION: None Received
3