BILL ANALYSIS SENATE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE BILL NO.:........AB 2018 Senator Quentin L. Kopp, Chairman AUTHOR:.............KATZ VERSION: (Orig.): (As Amend.):..04/12/93 FISCAL:..............YES SUBJECT: Driver's licenses: recreational trailers. DESCRIPTION: This bill would delete the January 1, 1994 sunset date on šprovisions authorizing drivers with special Class C licenses to štow recreational trailers up to 15,000 pounds gross weight. ANALYSIS: Existing law generally requires drivers pulling trailers with a šgross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of more than 10,000 pounds to šobtain a Class A driver's license. The law, however, makes an šexception for Class C (passenger vehicle) licensees through šJanuary 1, 1994, for towing certain noncommercial ("fifth wheel") šrecreational trailers up to 15,000 pounds gross weight. This bill would: 1. Repeal the January 1, 1994, sunset date and extend šindefinitely the provisions authorizing drivers with only a šregular Class C license to pull fifth-wheel travel trailers with ša GVWR of between 10,000 and 15,000 pounds, provided that a šspecial exam is passed and a license endorsement is issued by the šDepartment of Motor Vehicles (DMV) as under existing law. 2. Repeal the January 1, 1994, sunset date and extend šindefinitely the provisions authorizing drivers with a restricted šClass A license to pull fifth-wheel travel trailers with a GVWR šin excess of 15,000 pounds, or travel trailers in excess of š10,000 pounds, subject to existing requirements consisting of a šspecial exam and medical record reporting. COMMENTS: 1. This bill extends indefinitely two driver licensing šprovisions originally enacted on a trial basis by AB 4261 š(Hansen, Chapter 1358, Statutes of 1990), applicable to drivers šwho tow travel trailers and trailer coaches in excess of 10,000 špounds GVWR. These provisions are scheduled to sunset on January š1, 1994. 2. A required California Highway Patrol (CHP) study in response što AB 4261 on the subject of fifth-wheel travel trailers dated šJanuary 1993 determined "there has been no negative impact on šhighway safety" and that "there is no demonstrated need to šrequire additional training or testing for these! drivers". š Drivers desiring to tow these heavier trailers must take special DMV exams that are less stringent than the regular Class A šcommercial exams otherwise applicable to these heavier trailers. šThe DMV reports that very few of these licenses (Class C special štest or restricted Class A) have been issued, approximately 500 šper year. 3. According to the author, the profile of these RV drivers is špositive: they tend to be older drivers, not in a hurry, who štend to own their trailer equipment, and therefore have an šincentive to handle the equipment safely. The number of miles šdriven each year is not extensive, and their exposure is štherefore less. Assembly Votes: Floor: 78-0 W&M: 21-0 Trans: 16-0 POSITIONS: (Communicated to the committee before noon on Wednesday, June 23, 1993.) SUPPORT: Good Sam Club OPPOSED: 06/23/93