BILL ANALYSIS THIRD READING AB 2018 Katz (D) 8/26/93 in Assembly 21 78-0, p. 1859, 5/20/93 SUBJECT: Driver's licenses: recreational trailers SOURCE: Author ____________________________________________________________________________ DIGEST: This bill deletes the January 1, 1994 sunset date on šprovisions authorizing drivers with special Class C licenses to tow šrecreational trailers up to 15,000 pounds gross weight. Senate Floor Amendments of 8/26/93 delete an obsolete requirement in the šVehicle Code. ANALYSIS: Existing law generally requires drivers pulling trailers šwith a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of more than 10,000 pounds to šobtain a Class A driver's license. The law, however, makes an exception šfor Class C (passenger vehicle) licensees through January 1, 1994, for štowing certain noncommercial ("fifth wheel") recreational trailers up to š15,000 pounds gross weight. This bill would: 1. Repeal the January 1, 1994, sunset date and extend indefinitely the š provisions authorizing drivers with only a regular Class C license to pull fifth-wheel travel trailers with a GVWR of between 10,000 and 15,000 pounds, provided that a special exam is passed and a license endorsement is issued by the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) as under existing law. 2. Repeal the January 1, 1994, sunset date and extend indefinitely the š provisions authorizing drivers with a restricted Class A license to pull fifth-wheel travel trailers with a GVWR in excess of 15,000 pounds, or travel trailers in š excess of 10,000 pounds, subject to existing requirements consisting of a special exam and medical record reporting. 3. Repeal an obsolete requirement in the Vehicle Code which directs the š Department of Motor Vehicles to report to the Legislature on a telephone hotline no longer in operation. FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Committee: Yes Local: No SUPPORT: (Verified 8/26/93) Good Sam Club ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: According to the author's office, the profile of šthese RV drivers is positive: they tend to be older drivers, not in a šhurry, who tend to own their trailer equipment, and therefore have an šincentive to handle the equipment safely. The number of miles driven each šyear is not extensive, and their exposure is therefore less. RJG:sl 8/27/93 Senate Floor Analyses CONTINUED