BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                             


 ------------------------------------------------------------ 
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                    AB 78|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
|(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
|327-4478                          |                         |
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 
  
                              
                       THIRD READING
                              

Bill No:  AB 78
Author:   Gallegos (D)
Amended:  8/16/99 in Senate
Vote:     21

  
  SENATE INSURANCE COMMITTEE  :  8-2, 7/7/99
AYES:  Speier, Escutia, Figueroa, Hughes, Johnston, Leslie,  
  Schiff, Sher
NOES:  Johnson, Lewis

  SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  8-4, 9/3/99
AYES:  Johnston, Alpert, Bowen, Burton, Escutia, Karnette,  
  Perata, Vasconcellos
NOES:  Johnson, Kelley, Leslie, McPherson
NOT VOTING:  Mountjoy

 ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  52-28, 6/4/99 - See last page for vote
 
-
  SUBJECT  :    Health care coverage:  Department of Managed  
Health Care

  SOURCE  :     Author

 
  DIGEST  :    This bill establishes a new State Department of  
Managed Health Care and transfers the regulation of health  
care service plans from the State Department of  
Corporations (DOC) to the new department and later  
transfers the regulation of disability insurers from the  
DOC.

  ANALYSIS  :    Existing law:
                                                 CONTINUED





                                                       AB 78
                                                       Page  
2


1.Charges DOC, within the State Business, Transportation  
  and Housing Agency, with regulating health plans.

2.Charges State Department of Insurance (DOI) with the  
  responsibility for regulating health insurers.

AB 78:

1.Effective March 1, 2000, establishes a new, unspecified  
  managed care regulator and, effective July 1, 2000,  
  transfers the responsibility for regulating health plans  
  from DOC to the new regulator.

2 Calls for the transfer of DOC personnel and funds  
  dedicated to health plan regulation to the new regulator.

3.Specifies the various functions of the new regulator,  
  including a patient advocate division to represent the  
  interests of patients.

4.Establishes an Advisory Committee on Managed Care  
  consisting of 29 members and specifies the composition of  
  the committee.

5.Effective July 1, 2002, transfers the regulation of  
  health insurers from DOI to the new regulator including  
  insurers that provide coverage through preferred provider  
  organizations and other managed care systems.

6.Calls for the transfer of DOI personnel and funds  
  dedicated to health insurer regulation to the new  
  regulator.

7.Requires the new regulator on or before May 1, 2000, to  
  report to the Governor and Legislature regarding the need  
  to expand jurisdiction over medical groups and  
  independent practice associations that provide or arrange  
  for medical care and bear significant financial risk.

8.Declares that it is the intent of the Legislature to  
  conduct a study to evaluate the feasibility of  
  transferring all personnel and funds dedicated to the  
  insurers that cover hospital, medical, or surgical  







                                                       AB 78
                                                       Page  
3

  expenses to the department on or before July 1, 2002.

The Managed Health Care Improvement Task Force issued a  
report last year recommending that a new state entity for  
regulation of managed health care be created.  The task  
force called for an initial transfer of health plan  
regulation from DOC to the new regulator, to be followed by  
the phased-in transfer of regulation of other health care  
entities including health insurers.  Last week the State  
Auditor issued a report concluding that, despite receiving  
a $6.5 million budget increase in 1997 to enhance its  
regulation of health plans, DOC has shown only limited  
improvement in its efforts to  protect health plan  
enrollees from inadequate medical care.

This bill is similar to SB 406 (Rosenthal), which called  
for a new Board of Managed Care and was vetoed last year.   
According to the Governor's veto message:

"I am returning Senate Bill No. 406 without my signature.

"This bill would transfer the responsibility for regulating  
health care service plans from the Department of  
Corporations to a board with five members.  Three members  
would e appointed by the Governor and two members b the  
Legislature.  The Chairperson would hold a full time  
position, while the other four members would hold part time  
positions.  The Chairperson would appoint two advisors and  
each board member would appoint an additional advisor.  The  
bill would also establish a 29 member advisory board.

"This bill fails to deliver the reform it promises.  It  
would establish a weak and unaccountable regulatory  
bureaucracy with dispersed enforcement authority.  The  
Little Hoover commission, an independent non-partisan  
advisory organization, has rejected the key feature of this  
bill, establishing a board to regulate health plans,  
because the burden of collective decision making will not  
provide consistent and responsive leadership.

"The Commission instead concluded that health plans should  
be regulated by a focused department or agency lead by a  
single gubernatorial appointee.  
The Commission found that a single appointee would be more  







                                                       AB 78
                                                       Page  
4

accountable and would be in the best position to provide  
strong and decisive leadership, particularly on different  
issues lacking broad political consensus.

"The regulation of health care service plans must be  
improved.  That is why I sponsored legislation to create  
the Department of Managed Health Care lead by a single,  
focused regulator.  I am disappointed that the Legislature  
rejected this health care reform."

  SENATE FLOOR  :  22-13, 8/20/98
AYES:  Alpert, Ayala, Burton, Calderon, Costa, Dills,  
  Greene, Hayden, Hughes, Johnston, Karnette, Kopp,  
  Lockyer, O'Connell, Peace, Rosenthal, Schiff, Sher,  
  Solis, Thompson, Vasconcellos, Watson
NOES:  Brulte, Haynes, Hurtt, Johannessen, Johnson, Kelley,  
  Knight, Lewis, McPherson, Monteith, Mountjoy, Rainey
NOT VOTING:  Craven, Leslie, Maddy, Polanco

Assemblymember votes who are now Senators:

AYES:  Baca, Bowen, Escutia, Figueroa, Murray, Ortiz,  
  Perata
NOES:  Morrow, Poochigian

  FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  Yes   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
Local:  Yes

Appropriates $3 million from the State Corporations Fund to  
cover one-time costs and, presumably, some amount of  
first-year operating costs.  Annual costs would depend on  
the scope of additional regulatory and consumer assistance  
activities assumed by the new department.

  SUPPORT  :   (Per Senate Insurance Committee analysis, but  
unable to verify at time of writing)

AARP
American Federation of State, County and Municipal  
Employees
California Coalition of Nurse Practitioners
California Psychiatric Association
California Seniors Coalition
California Teachers Association







                                                       AB 78
                                                       Page  
5

Congress of California Seniors
Health Access California
Medical Board of California
Resources for Independent Living
Tri-Pac Patient Provider Partnership Organization
Western Center on Law and Poverty

  OPPOSITION  :    (Per Senate Insurance Committee analysis,  
but unable to verify at time of writing)

American Nurses Association/California
Association of California Life and Health Insurance  
Companies
California Association of Health Plans
California Association of Health Underwriters
Health Insurance Association of America
Los Angeles Employers Health Care Association
Pacific Life Insurance

  ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The author states that it is time  
to transfer plan regulation out of DOC to a new regulator  
dedicated to consumer protection and quality of care.  The  
author also believes it is inefficient and confusing for  
consumers to have two different departments, DOC and DOI,  
regulate plans and insurers, and therefore also calls for  
the later transfer of health insurance to the new  
regulator.  In light of recent medical practice group  
bankruptcies, the author is also concerned about enhancing  
state authority over medical groups and independent  
practice associations that arrange for care and assume  
significant financial risk.  This bill calls on the new  
regulator to report to the Governor and Legislature on this  
issue by next May.
  
  Supporters agree that we need a new state system of  
governance of managed health care.  Some endorsed a prior  
version of this bill that called for a five-member Board of  
Managed Health Care, and others have endorsed moving  
regulation to the State Health and Human Services Agency.

 ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    The California Association of  
Health Plans is concerned that the creation of an appointed  
board, instead of a single appointed executive, would  
weaken regulation; and that the inclusion of the DOI would  







                                                       AB 78
                                                       Page  
6

erode the focus on plans and their unique regulatory  
requirements.  The Association of California Life and  
Health Insurance Companies opposes the bill as it would  
require regulation of insurers as though they were plans,  
which would subject them to increased regulatory costs, and  
prefers only a study be done.  The California Association  
of Health Underwriters believes the board structure would  
reduce accountability, slow the decision-making process,  
defuse the ability to create clear direction and lead to  
inconsistent regulation as appointed boards are vulnerable  
to extreme and often inappropriate political influences,  
fragmentation and paralysis.  Pacific Life Insurance  
Company states that there are several complex issues which  
must be addressed:  a) insurers pay a premium tax which is  
significantly greater than the bank and corporations tax  
paid by plans; b) insurers are required to set aside cash  
reserves and a guarantee fund while plans are not; c)  
claims are subject to different standards; d) insurers are  
not designed to regulate quality as plans are; and e) fee  
structures and assessments are very different for plans and  
insurers.
  
ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :
AYES:  Alquist, Aroner, Bock, Calderon, Cardenas, Cardoza,  
  Cedillo, Corbett, Correa, Cunneen, Davis, Ducheny, Dutra,  
  Firebaugh, Florez, Floyd, Gallegos, Granlund, Havice,  
  Hertzberg, Honda, Jackson, Keeley, Knox, Kuehl, Lempert,  
  Longville, Lowenthal, Machado, Maldonado, Mazzoni,  
  Migden, Nakano, Papan, Pescetti, Reyes, Romero, Scott,  
  Shelley, Soto, Steinberg, Strom-Martin, Thomson,  
  Torlakson, Vincent, Washington, Wayne, Wesson, Wiggins,  
  Wildman, Wright, Villaraigosa
NOES:  Aanestad, Ackerman, Ashburn, Baldwin, Bates, Battin,  
  Baugh, Brewer, Briggs, Campbell, Cox, Dickerson,  
  Frusetta, House, Kaloogian, Leach, Leonard, Maddox,  
  Margett, McClintock, Olberg, Oller, Robert Pacheco, Rod  
  Pacheco, Runner, Strickland, Thompson, Zettel

DLW:kb  9/7/99   Senate Floor Analyses 

               SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                      ****  END  ****