BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                             


 ------------------------------------------------------------ 
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                    AB 78|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
|(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
|327-4478                          |                         |
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 
  
                              
                       THIRD READING
                              

Bill No:  AB 78
Author:   Gallegos (D)
Amended:  9/8/99 in Senate
Vote:     21

  
  SENATE INSURANCE COMMITTEE  :  8-2, 7/7/99
AYES:  Speier, Escutia, Figueroa, Hughes, Johnston, Leslie,  
  Schiff, Sher
NOES:  Johnson, Lewis

  SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  8-4, 9/3/99
AYES:  Johnston, Alpert, Bowen, Burton, Escutia, Karnette,  
  Perata, Vasconcellos
NOES:  Johnson, Kelley, Leslie, McPherson
NOT VOTING:  Mountjoy

  ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  52-28, 6/4/99 - See last page for vote
 
-
  SUBJECT  :    Health care coverage:  Department of Managed  
Health Care

  SOURCE  :     Author

 
  DIGEST  :    This bill transfers responsibility for the  
implementation of programs to the Department of Managed  
Care in the State Business, Transportation, and Housing  
Agency, established pursuant to the bill, and makes  
conforming changes.

The bill also establishes in the State Department of  
Managed Care an Advisory Committee on Managed Care to  
                                                 CONTINUED





                                                       AB 78
                                                       Page  
2

assist and advise the director of the State Department of  
Managed Care on various issues.

The bill also establishes in the department an Office of  
Patient Advocate, in order to provide educational material  
to plan enrollees and to render advice and assistance to  
enrollees.

  Senate Floor Amendments  of 9/8/99 incorporate the  
Governor's recommendations for the reorganized regulation  
of health plans, including HMOs.

  ANALYSIS  :    Existing law:

1.Charges DOC, within the State Business, Transportation  
  and Housing Agency, with regulating health plans.

2.Charges State Department of Insurance (DOI) with the  
  responsibility for regulating health insurers.

The bill:

1.Includes legislative findings that it is in the public  
  interest that the regulation of health plans should be  
  undertaken b a department of state government devoted  
  exclusively to that issue.

2.Moves the regulation of health plans from the State  
  Department of Corporations (DOC) in the State Business,  
  Transportation and Housing Agency (BT&H) to a new State  
  Department of Managed Care (DMC) in BT & H).

3.Transfers the unexpended balance of funds from DOC to the  
  new department as needed.

4.Includes a mission statement calling on the DMC to ensure  
  that health plans provide enrollees with access to  
  quality health care services

5.Adds legislative intent calling on the DMC to  
  expeditiously review enrollee grievances.

6.Establishes a director of the DMC, appointed by the  
  Governor and subject to Senate confirmation, who is to be  







                                                       AB 78
                                                       Page  
3

  supported by a chief deputy, a public information  
  officer, a chief enforcement counsel, legal counsel and  
  other staff as needed.

 7.  Establishes a new Office of Patient Advocate, headed  
    by a Patient Advocate appointed by the Governor and  
    subject to Senate confirmation, with the Office:

    A.    Helping patients who have complaints against  
      their HMOs or who need help in using the new  
      Independent Review Process.

    B.    Developing educational guides for consumers on  
      their health care rights, to be published in English  
      and in other languages, and doing public outreach and  
      education.

    C.    Issuing an annual HMO quality of care report  
      card, to be put on the DMC's Internet website.

    D.    Making recommendations to the DMC on enforcement  
      actions to protect patients.

 8.  Renames and modifies an existing advisory committee,  
    giving the Assembly Speaker and Senate Rules Committee  
    three appointees each to the advisory committee, with  
    other appointments made by the Governor.

 9.  Establishes a Clinical Advisory Panel appointed by the  
    director of DMC to help monitor the independent review  
    process (to be established by other legislation), and  
    to do other clinical reviews related to reducing  
    clinical errors and promoting patient safety.

 10. Provides for the public disclosure of documents  
    submitted to the DMC unless such disclosure is contrary  
    to law.

 11. Requires health plans to disclose to patients  
    information about their right to a second opinion and  
    their ability to access the independent review system.

 12. Increases the ability of health plans to offer  
    point-of-service plan contracts. 







                                                       AB 78
                                                       Page  
4


 13. Requires a study of the feasibility of transferring  
    the regulation of health insurance from the State  
    Department of Insurance to the new DMC.

 14. Gives the DMC director new enforcement authority  
    including the ability to order the discontinuance of  
    violations that threaten irreparable loss and injury to  
    patients.

 15. Gives the DMC director contingent assessment authority  
    to adjust health plan fees in FY 2000-2001 if necessary  
    to support the reorganization transition.

 16. Makes conforming changes in other code sections  
    including the Insurance Code, Civil Code and Business  
    and Professions Code.

The Managed Health Care Improvement Task Force issued a  
report last year recommending that a new state entity for  
regulation of managed health care be created.  The task  
force called for an initial transfer of health plan  
regulation from DOC to the new regulator, to be followed by  
the phased-in transfer of regulation of other health care  
entities including health insurers.  Last week the State  
Auditor issued a report concluding that, despite receiving  
a $6.5 million budget increase in 1997 to enhance its  
regulation of health plans, DOC has shown only limited  
improvement in its efforts to  protect health plan  
enrollees from inadequate medical care.

Similar legislation (SB 406 - Rosenthal) would have created  
a Board of Managed Care and was vetoed last year.   
According to the Governor's veto message:

"I am returning Senate Bill No. 406 without my signature.

"This bill would transfer the responsibility for regulating  
health care service plans from the Department of  
Corporations to a board with five members.  Three members  
would e appointed by the Governor and two members b the  
Legislature.  The Chairperson would hold a full time  
position, while the other four members would hold part time  
positions.  The Chairperson would appoint two advisors and  







                                                       AB 78
                                                       Page  
5

each board member would appoint an additional advisor.  The  
bill would also establish a 29 member advisory board.

"This bill fails to deliver the reform it promises.  It  
would establish a weak and unaccountable regulatory  
bureaucracy with dispersed enforcement authority.  The  
Little Hoover commission, an independent non-partisan  
advisory organization, has rejected the key feature of this  
bill, establishing a board to regulate health plans,  
because the burden of collective decision making will not  
provide consistent and responsive leadership.

"The Commission instead concluded that health plans should  
be regulated by a focused department or agency lead by a  
single gubernatorial appointee.  
The Commission found that a single appointee would be more  
accountable and would be in the best position to provide  
strong and decisive leadership, particularly on different  
issues lacking broad political consensus.

"The regulation of health care service plans must be  
improved.  That is why I sponsored legislation to create  
the Department of Managed Health Care lead by a single,  
focused regulator.  I am disappointed that the Legislature  
rejected this health care reform."

  SENATE FLOOR  :  22-13, 8/20/98
AYES:  Alpert, Ayala, Burton, Calderon, Costa, Dills,  
  Greene, Hayden, Hughes, Johnston, Karnette, Kopp,  
  Lockyer, O'Connell, Peace, Rosenthal, Schiff, Sher,  
  Solis, Thompson, Vasconcellos, Watson
NOES:  Brulte, Haynes, Hurtt, Johannessen, Johnson, Kelley,  
  Knight, Lewis, McPherson, Monteith, Mountjoy, Rainey
NOT VOTING:  Craven, Leslie, Maddy, Polanco

Assemblymember votes who are now Senators:

AYES:  Baca, Bowen, Escutia, Figueroa, Murray, Ortiz,  
  Perata
NOES:  Morrow, Poochigian

  FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  Yes   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
Local:  Yes








                                                       AB 78
                                                       Page  
6

  ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The author states that it is time  
to transfer plan regulation out of DOC to a new regulator  
dedicated to consumer protection and quality of care.  The  
author also believes it is inefficient and confusing for  
consumers to have two different departments, DOC and DOI,  
regulate plans and insurers, and therefore also calls for  
the later transfer of health insurance to the new  
regulator.  In light of recent medical practice group  
bankruptcies, the author is also concerned about enhancing  
state authority over medical groups and independent  
practice associations that arrange for care and assume  
significant financial risk.
  
ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  52-28, 6/4/99
AYES:  Alquist, Aroner, Bock, Calderon, Cardenas, Cardoza,  
  Cedillo, Corbett, Correa, Cunneen, Davis, Ducheny, Dutra,  
  Firebaugh, Florez, Floyd, Gallegos, Granlund, Havice,  
  Hertzberg, Honda, Jackson, Keeley, Knox, Kuehl, Lempert,  
  Longville, Lowenthal, Machado, Maldonado, Mazzoni,  
  Migden, Nakano, Papan, Pescetti, Reyes, Romero, Scott,  
  Shelley, Soto, Steinberg, Strom-Martin, Thomson,  
  Torlakson, Vincent, Washington, Wayne, Wesson, Wiggins,  
  Wildman, Wright, Villaraigosa
NOES:  Aanestad, Ackerman, Ashburn, Baldwin, Bates, Battin,  
  Baugh, Brewer, Briggs, Campbell, Cox, Dickerson,  
  Frusetta, House, Kaloogian, Leach, Leonard, Maddox,  
  Margett, McClintock, Olberg, Oller, Robert Pacheco, Rod  
  Pacheco, Runner, Strickland, Thompson, Zettel

DLW:kb  9/9/99   Senate Floor Analyses 

             SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  NONE RECEIVED

                      ****  END  ****