BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 107
                                                                  Page  1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 107 (Knox)
          As Amended August 8, 2000
          Majority vote
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |42-38|(May 27, 1999)  |SENATE: |21-16|(August 29,    |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2000)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
            
           Original Committee Reference:    P.E.,R. & S.S.  

           SUMMARY  :  Prohibits new or additional investments by the Public  
          Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and the State Teachers'  
          Retirement System (CalSTRS), on and after January 1, 2001, in  
          tobacco companies and requires a divestment of those existing  
          investments by July 1, 2002. 

           The Senate amendments  delete the Assembly version of this bill  
          and instead:

          1)Prohibit, on and after January 1, 2001, CalPERS and CalSTRS  
            from making new or additional investments in any "tobacco  
            company".

          2)Define "tobacco company" for purposes of this bill as a  
            business entity that derives more than 10% of its net revenue,  
            excluding excise taxes, from the manufacture of consumer  
            tobacco products or the processing of leaf tobacco.

          3)Require that CalPERS and CalSTRS divest existing investment in  
            tobacco companies so that by July 1, 2002, those funds from  
            those retirement systems are no longer invested in tobacco  
            companies.

          4)Indemnify, by the General Fund, present and former CalPERS and  
            CalSTRS board members, state officers and employees, and  
            investment managers from all liability, losses or damages  
            sustained by reason of any decision not to invest in tobacco  
            companies pursuant to the provisions of this bill.

           EXISTING LAW  :  States Proposition 162, "The California Pension  
          Protection Act of 1992," while giving the retirement boards sole  
          and exclusive authority to administer the retirement systems,  
          also gives the Legislature the authority to require divestment  








                                                                  AB 107
                                                                  Page  2

          of funds it deems are fiscally imprudent investments provided  
          that the prohibition meets the standard of fiduciary care and  
          loyalty required of the retirement boards.

           AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill provided employers whose  
          employees participate in CalPERS health care program (PEMHCA)  
          the option to extend health benefits coverage to the domestic  
          partners of their employees and annuitants.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  This bill would result in unknown but  
          potentially significant costs to CalSTRS, CalPERS and the state  
          General Fund.  The divestment of tobacco holdings will result in  
          transaction costs as tobacco equities are sold and the proceeds  
          are reinvested in other companies.  Additionally, it is unknown  
          what impact tobacco divestment will have on the future  
          investment returns of CalSTRS and CalPERS. 

           COMMENTS  :  As pointed out in the legislative findings and  
          declarations:

          1)The cost to the state of California for healthcare services  
            for person with tobacco-related illnesses is $630 million  
            annually.  

          2)California spends $50 million annually on anti-smoking  
            education programs.

          3)In 1999, the leading cigarette manufacturer's stock lost 52%  
            in value, and other public institutional investors have  
            restricted or ceased tobacco industry investments.


           Analysis Prepared by  :  Karon Green / P.E.R. & S.S. / (916)  
          319-3957 



                                                               FN: 0006994