BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                AB 649
                                                                Page  1

        CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
        AB 649 (Machado)
        As Amended June 8, 2000
        2/3 vote.  Urgency
         
         ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
        |ASSEMBLY: |65-10|(May 20, 1999)  |SENATE: |28-8 |(June 15, 2000)      |
        |          |     |                |        |     |                     |
         ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          
         

         ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
        |COMMITTEE VOTE:  |6-0  |(June 21, 2000)     |RECOMMENDATION: |Concur    |
        |                 |     |                    |                |          |
         ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

        Original Committee Reference:   L. & E.  
         
        SUMMARY :  Makes various changes in the state negotiated memoranda  
        of understanding contracts (MOUs) for 1999-2001.  These MOU  
        contracts need technical clean-up.  Also included are two  
        provisions reflecting other negotiated agreements. 

         The Senate amendments  delete the Assembly version of this bill, and  
        instead:

        1)Conform drug testing policy with the Bargaining Unit 11 (BU 11)  
          collective bargaining agreement.

        2)Include managers and supervisors in safety retirement  
          inadvertently omitted and include only those units that agreed to  
          this provision in collective bargaining.

        3)Add benefit contracts covering excluded employees to those exempt  
          from Department of General Services (DGS) review.

        4)Appropriate funding to the Rural Health Subsidy Program.

        5)Conform employee health benefit eligibility for BU 19 members  
          which was inadvertently omitted in the ratifying legislation last  
          year.

        6)Allow State Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS) members who  
          become state employees to stay in CalSTRS, instead of joining the  








                                                                AB 649
                                                                Page  2

          Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS).

        7)Permit security officers employed by the State Department of  
          Justice (DOJ) to have CalPERS state peace officer/firefighter  
          (POFF) retirement benefits.

        8)Double-join this bill to AB 1441 (Lempert), which is currently  
          awaiting the Governor's signature.

        9)Declare that this bill is an urgency measure to take effect  
          immediately.

         AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill required state agency  
        employers to make payment of overtime wages no later than the  
        payday for the next regular payroll period.
         
        FISCAL EFFECT  :  Appropriates $65,414,288 from the General Fund and  
        various special funds for allocation for various state employee  
        benefits or programs, including state employee compensation, the  
        Work and Family Fund, and the Rural Area Health Subsidy Program.   

         COMMENTS  :  

        1)State BU 11 (i.e., Engineering and Scientific Technician,  
          represented by the California State Employee Association) MOU,  
          which took effect July 1, 1999, provides for an election of  
          remedies/forums when employees are disciplined or rejected on  
          probation for positive drug test results.

        Existing law does not allow the employee to choose between a  
          neutral third party grievance procedure or an appeal to the State  
          Personnel Board (SPB).  In addition, statutory language is needed  
          to make it clear that when an employee elects a third party,  
          his/her access to court review is under the law governing the  
          arbitration process, and not under the law governing SPB appeals.

        This bill amends the Government Code and the Code of Civil  
          Procedure to conform with the BU 11 collective bargaining  
          agreement.

        SPB states in opposition that, "This bill would, among other  
          things, make major changes in the way appeals from adverse  
          actions and rejections during probation involving civil service  
          employees in BU 11 (engineering and scientific technicians) are  
          adjudicated.  Additionally, SPB states that they are "?opposed to  








                                                                AB 649
                                                                Page  3

          the provisions of the bill that infringe on the board's  
          constitutional obligations to review disciplinary actions and  
          rejections during probation taken against employees in BU 11  
          elating to positive drug test results.  The California  
          Constitution mandates that the board administer and enforce the  
          merit aspects of the state civil service, including reviewing  
          disciplinary actions against state employees."

        2)Existing law provides that the Department of Personnel  
          Administration (DPA) administers safety retirement benefits for  
          state employees through the collective bargaining process, when  
          this provision was  added to law.  The inclusion of managers and  
          supervisors in the safety requirement was inadvertently omitted.   
          In addition, not all bargaining units agreed to the DPA process  
          of inclusion of managers and supervisors in safety retirement.  

        This bill amends the Government Code (i.e., Section 19816.20 and  
          Section 19816.20 (d)) to include excluded employees in the  
          definition of "state employees" who are not members of civil  
          service and amends Government Code Section 20405.1 (c) to cover  
          only those units that agreed to the provision in collective  
          bargaining.

        3)Existing Public Contract Code was previously amended to exclude  
          DPA from the DGS review of contracts for benefits, health and  
          safety, and training services for those items bargained in an  
          MOU.  Contracts covering "excluded employees" (i.e., managers and  
          supervisors), however, are not exempt from DGS review.

        This bill amends the Public Contract Code (Section 10295.4) to  
          extend the exclusion to cover the benefit contracts covering  
          "excluded employees."

        4)Existing law, pursuant to SB 514 (Chesbro), Chapter 743, Statutes  
          of 1999, authorized a rural health subsidy for state employees  
          and retirees who live in areas of the state where there is no  
          health maintenance organization (HMO) available.

        Monies were not appropriated to the Work and Family Program and the  
          Rural Health Subsidy Program pursuant to Chapter 743.

        This bill appropriates money to fully fund the Employee  
          Compensation Package, fulfilling the state's obligations made in  
          the MOUs negotiated with the 21 bargaining units.









                                                                AB 649
                                                                Page  4

        This is a technical change that appropriates the monies that were  
          agreed to in bargaining.

        5)As the result of an MOU agreed to in 1999, the employee  
          eligibility for representation in BU 19 (i.e., Health and Social  
          Services Professionals, represented by AFSCME) was changed to be  
          consistent with all other state employees.  When the legislation  
          was passed that ratified the MOU for BU 19, the change in  
          employee eligibility was inadvertently omitted.

        This bill would amend Government Code Section 22754.2 to remove  
          Subsection 4, which defines employee eligibility for BU 19.

        6)Existing CalSTRS law provides, pursuant to 1997 legislation, that  
          a CalSTRS member who subsequently was employed by the California  
          Community Colleges in a position requiring CalPERS membership may  
          elect to remain in CalSTRS.

        This bill:

           a)   Allows any certificated teacher member of CalSTRS who  
             becomes employed by the state to stay in CalSTRS instead of  
             joining CalPERS;

           b)   Allows current state employees, who were vested member of  
             CalSTRS and became mandatory members of the CalPERS Second  
             Tier plan, to elect to return to CalSTRS membership;

           c)   Applies only to employees who were hired after June 30,  
             1991, and before the date the First Tier plan became effective  
             for new employees represented by this union; and,

           d)   Provides that employees hired on and after January 1, 2000  
             will have the option of membership under the Second Tier or  
             the First Tier plan.

        5)Existing CalPERS law specifically provides that security officers  
          of DOJ shall be "state miscellaneous" members of CalPERS.  "State  
          miscellaneous" members of CalPERS receive a retirement benefit  
          based on the "2% at age 55" formula, and are covered by "Ordinary  
          Disability Retirement" benefits.

        This bill provides that security officers of DOJ shall be "state  
          POFF" members of CalPERS, receiving a retirement benefit based on  
          the "3% at age 50" formula, and are covered by "Industrial  








                                                                AB 649
                                                                Page  5

          Disability Retirement" benefits.

        According to DPA "Initially the Security Officer, DOJ was not  
          included in POFF because, when the class was established, the  
          existing Attorney General did not want them included.  However,  
          over the past ten to 12 years, their duties have significantly  
          been expanded, necessitating recruitment of a more highly trained  
          officer.  The DOJ supports the inclusion of the Security Officer  
          into the POFF and we (DPA) agreed to including them in  
          bargaining."


         Analysis Prepared by  :  Karon Green / P.E., R. & S.S. / (916)  
        319-3957 



                                                                 FN: 0006183