BILL ANALYSIS
AB 869
Page 1
Date of Hearing: January 26, 2000
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HEALTH
Martin Gallegos, Chair
AB 869 (Keeley) - As Amended: January 24, 2000
SUBJECT : Oral conscious sedation.
SUMMARY : Delays the implementation of specified requirements
that must be met before a dentist may administer oral conscious
sedation to a minor patient from January 1, 2000, to January 1,
2001.
EXISTING LAW :
1)Prohibits dentists, beginning January 1, 2000, from
administering oral conscious sedation on an outpatient basis
to a minor patient unless the dentist holds a valid general
anesthesia permit, a conscious sedation permit, or has been
certified by the Dental Board of California (Board) to
administer oral sedation to minor patients.
1)Establishes a procedure for obtaining an oral conscious
sedation permit, requiring dentists to submit evidence to the
Board that certain requirements have been met.
1)Requires oral conscious sedation permit holders to complete a
minimum of seven hours of approved courses of study related to
oral conscious sedation of minor patients as a condition of
certification renewal as an oral conscious sedation provider.
1)Defines oral conscious sedation as a minimally depressed level
of consciousness produced by oral medication that retains the
patient's ability to maintain independently and continuously
an airway, and respond appropriately to physical stimulation
and verbal command.
FISCAL EFFECT : None
COMMENTS :
PURPOSE OF THIS BILL . According to the author, this bill is
sponsored by the California Dental Association (CDA) to delay,
by one year, the implementation of a bill enacted in 1998 to
strengthen safeguards for minor patients receiving oral
AB 869
Page 2
conscious sedation in dental offices.
AB 2006 (Keeley), Chapter 513, Statutes of 1998, which was also
sponsored by CDA, required dentists who did not already have a
general anesthesia permit or a conscious sedation permit, to
obtain an oral conscious sedation permit before administering
oral conscious sedation to a minor. This requirement was to go
into effect January 1 of this year. However, the Board has not
yet adopted regulations to administer this new requirement, and
a delay of one year is necessary to complete the regulatory
process.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION :
Support
California Dental Association (sponsor)
Opposition
None on file
Analysis Prepared by : Vincent D. Marchand / HEALTH / (916)
319-2097