BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                             


 ------------------------------------------------------------ 
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 1039|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
|(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
|327-4478                          |                         |
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 
  
                              
                       THIRD READING
                              

Bill No:  AB 1039
Author:   Aroner (D)
Amended:  9/8/99 in Senate
Vote:     21

  
  SENATE HEALTH & HUMAN SERV. COMMITTEE  : 6-1, 7/14/99
AYES:  Escutia, Figueroa, Hughes, Polanco, Solis,  
  Vasconcellos
NOES:  Haynes
NOT VOTING:  Morrow, Mountjoy

  SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  9-3, 9/9/99
AYES:  Johnston, Alpert, Bowen, Burton, Escutia, Karnette,  
  McPherson, Perata, Vasconcellos
NOES:  Kelley, Leslie, Mountjoy

 ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  42-36, 6/3/99 - See last page for vote
 

  SUBJECT  :    CalWORKs program

  SOURCE  :     Western Center on Law and Poverty

 
  DIGEST  :    This bill:

1. Authorizes the State Department of Social Services to  
   approve demonstration projects, in up-to-five counties,  
   to provide a wage-based subsidized employment program  
   for CalWORKs recipients in lieu of, or in addition to,  
   participating in community service;

2. Requires counties to notify recipients of their right,  
                                                 CONTINUED





                                                     AB 1039
                                                      Page  
2

   as provided in current law, to contest terms of a  
   welfare to work plan;

3. Allows parents enrolled in self initiated education  
   program to count a specified amount of study time toward  
   their weekly required hours of work activity;

4. Requires the district attorney to determine if certain  
   former recipients have good cause for noncooperation  
   with child support enforcement. 

  ANALYSIS :    Existing law:

The federal welfare reform enacted in 1996 (TANF) initially  
was implemented in California as the CalWORKs program in  
1997 (AB 1542, Chapter 270, Statutes of 1997), and amended  
by AB 2722 (Chapter 903, Statutes of 1998).  The CalWORKs  
program provides time-limited cash assistance and  
supportive services to eligible low-income families.  Under  
CalWORKs, recipients participate in certain welfare-to-work  
activities for a specified number of hours each week,  
unless otherwise exempt.

Existing law also contains the following provisions:

 1.  Community Service -- Existing law permits counties to  
    provide community service activities for CalWORKs  
    recipients who have not yet met time limits and are not  
    employed in unsubsidized employment sufficient to meet  
    the required hours of participation.  It also requires  
    counties to provide community service activities for  
    CalWORKs recipients who have met their 18-24 month time  
    limits and cannot find unsubsidized employment  
    sufficient to meet the required hours of participation,  
    when the county certifies that no job is currently  
    available to fulfill the required hours.

 2.  Welfare-to-work plan -- Existing law provides that an  
    applicant for, or a recipient of, CalWORKs benefits who  
    is dissatisfied with his or her welfare-to-work plan  
    may seek review through an independent assessment  
    process or a state or county hearing or grievance  
    process.








                                                     AB 1039
                                                       Page  
3

 3.  Program requirements -- Existing law requires that the  
    county provide a CalWORKs applicant or recipient with a  
    description of program requirements, in writing or  
    orally, as necessary.

 4.  Self initiated programs -- Existing law provides that  
    any CalWORKs recipient who, at the time he or she is  
    required to participate in welfare-to-work activities,  
    is enrolled in any undergraduate degree or certificate  
    program, may continue in that program if the county  
    determines the program is likely to lead to employment.  
     Existing law further requires that a CalWORKs  
    recipient who is participating in educational or  
    vocational training and whose weekly hours of  
    classroom, laboratory, or internship activities total  
    less than 32, must participate up to the required 32  
    hours in other work activities which are more narrowly  
    defined than for other CalWORKs recipients.

 5.  Requires that CalWORKs recipients participate in  
    certain activities for a specified number of hours each  
    week, unless otherwise exempt.  

 6.  Child support -- Existing law requires CalWORKs  
    applicants and recipients to cooperate with child  
    support services unless they have established good  
    cause for not doing so as determined by the county  
    welfare department.  Existing law also requires the  
    district attorney to suspend child support enforcement  
    efforts if the county welfare department makes a  
    finding of good cause for a failure to cooperate.

This bill would make the following changes to current law.

 1.  Subsidized employment - This bill permits the director  
    of the Department of Social Services to approve  
    demonstration projects, in up-to-five counties to  
    provide a subsidized employment program as an  
    alternative, or in addition to, community service  
    activities, subject to the following conditions:

    Participants in subsidized employment would be entitled  
       to a stipend of:








                                                     AB 1039
                                                       Page  
4

    A.     $90 per month for mandatory payroll deductions  
       and other work expenses instead of the earned income  
       disregard; participation shall not exceed one year  
       in duration.

    B.     Specifies provisions for handling accrued sick  
       leave or vacation after the end of subsidized  
       employment.

    C.     Participants who fail to perform the required  
       number of hours in the first month would be entitled  
       to an amount equal to the wages not received for the  
       hours not worked, but shall be ineligible for the  
       program if they fail to meet the work requirement in  
       the second month.

    D.     Employers or entities other than the county  
       shall pay participants' wages.

    E.     Counties may fund the wages for subsidized  
       employment through their single allocation or any  
       other funds.

    F.     Counties shall monitor the retention of  
       participants as permanent employees of employers  
       participating in subsidized employment and cancel  
       participation of employers who demonstrate an  
       unwillingness to permanently hire individuals who  
       have participated in subsidized employment.

    G.     Counties approved to participate shall be given  
       the option of participating in community service in  
       lieu of subsidized employment.

    H.     Specifies earnings shall not be considered in  
       determining eligibility for the CalWORKS program,  
       but shall be considered in determining the CalWORKS  
       grant amount.

    I.     Implementation of subsidized employment projects  
       would be contingent upon funding in the annual  
       Budget Act.

    J.     The director would evaluate the demonstration  







                                                     AB 1039
                                                       Page  
5

       projects as specified.

    K.     Specifies that subsidized employment shall be  
       counted as welfare-to-work activities and shall be  
       deemed to be grant-based on-the-job training.

 2.  Sick leave, hours per week -- This bill requires  
    counties to count toward the participant's weekly hours  
    of participation requirement the hours of sick leave  
    authorized by the employer and hours a participant  
    cannot work because of employer-recognized holidays.   
    Also, this bill requires that participants shall be  
    considered employees for all purposes, including the  
    Fair Labor Standards Act, and must be compensated at no  
    less than the higher of the state or federal minimum  
    wage.

 3.  EITC -- This bill requires that counties shall assist  
    recipients in subsidized employment in applying and  
    qualifying for the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC).

 4.  Welfare to work plans --AB 1039 requires counties to  
    include, in their existing notice to CalWORKs  
    applicants and in the welfare-to-work plan, a  
    description of the right of the applicant or recipient  
    to contest the terms of his or her welfare-to-work plan  
    or seek changes in the plan.

 5.  Allowable work hours -- This bill conforms the  
    allowable work activities for students to the allowable  
    work activities for other CalWORKs recipients.

 6.  Child support -- This bill permits a former CalWORKs  
    recipient to claim a good cause exemption from the  
    county welfare department for noncooperation with child  
    support services in the same manner as CalWORKs  
    applicants and recipients.

 7.  Study time -- This bill provides that CalWORKs  
    recipients enrolled in an educational or vocational  
    training program are entitled to count classroom  
    preparation time toward their 32-hour work  
    participation requirements and presumes that one hour  
    of study time is required for each hour of classroom  







                                                     AB 1039
                                                       Page  
6

    instruction, up to a maximum of six hours per week.

  Comments  

As part of California's welfare reform plan, a CalWORKs  
recipient who is not employed after 18 or 24 months on aid  
must go into community service employment.  Community  
service employment is work performed by recipients of  
public assistance that otherwise would have gone undone by  
employees in the public, private or non-profit sector.   
There are two broad approaches to community service:   
workfare and wage-based community service.  Under workfare,  
recipients are required to participate in community service  
as a condition of receiving their public assistance grant.   
Under wage-based community service, the recipient's grant  
is used to fully or partially offset wages that are paid to  
the recipient.

The Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) recently completed a  
report on CalWORKs community service, "CalWORKs Community  
Service, What Does It Mean for California?" (February 4,  
1999).  In that report, LAO found that wage-based community  
service results in more income for families by allowing  
them to access the EITC.  A typical family of three in  
wage-based community service would receive an EITC of about  
$250 per month, or about $3,000 per year.  The report also  
noted that wage-based community service aids recipients in  
the transition to work by giving participants actual work  
experience.  The author states it is her intent to allow,  
but not mandate, counties to create wage-based community  
service programs for CalWORKs recipients that will give  
those recipients real-life work opportunities and increase  
their household income.

Self-initiated Education Programs

The author states that one purpose of this bill is to  
correct discriminatory hourly requirements for CalWORKs  
recipients who are self-initiated students.  She states  
that a recent oversight hearing by the Select Committee on  
Welfare Reform Implementation on the role of community  
colleges in welfare reform determined there are several  
barriers to CalWORKs recipients receiving an education.   
One of the major barriers identified was the current law  







                                                     AB 1039
                                                       Page  
7

requirement that students may not count their study time  
towards their work participation hours.

Child Support Assurance

Current law authorizes child support assurances  
demonstration programs in up to three counties; this bill  
instead authorizes three demonstration programs, in two or  
more counties, if the appropriate operational fiscal  
arrangements are achieved and if approved by the California  
Department of Social Services.  This bill also revises the  
specific limits on the number of persons who may  
participate in CSA and revises evaluation criteria for the  
CSA pilot projects.  Also, this bill specifies that no  
funding source for CSA shall be used if it would cause  
participants to be subject to the time limits required  
under CalWORKs.  (CSA is intended to be an alternative to  
CalWORKs.)

Current law also required that one of the CSA pilot  
programs had to replicate a model implemented in New York  
State.  This bill deletes that requirement.







  FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
Local:  Yes

According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

                Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

  Major Provisions     1999-2000    2000-01     2001-02     Fund

                    Unknown costs potentially      General
                   exceeding $1 million

  SUPPORT  :    (Unable to verify at time of writing)

Western Center on Law and Poverty (source)







                                                     AB 1039
                                                       Page  
8

State Department of Finance
American Federation of State, County and Municipal  
Employees
California Church IMPACT
California Federation of Business and Professional Women
California National Organization of Women
Children's Advocacy Institute
Community College League of California
Equal Rights Advocates
Housing California
Jericho
San Diego Community College District
Santa Barbara Family Care Center
23 Individuals

  OPPOSITION  :    (Unable to verify at time of writing)

State Department of Finance

  ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    Western Center on Law and Poverty,  
the bill's sponsor, notes that current law puts student  
CalWORKs participants at a distinct disadvantage by  
requiring more combined hours of work activity than other  
participants.  A single parent recipient in a full-time  
education program must add 17-20 hours of employment or  
other work activities to satisfy the CalWORKs requirement.   
If that student's study time is two hours for each  
classroom hour and he or she is taking 15 units, that  
student will have to devote 62 hours per week of education  
or work activities to meet the participation requirement,  
since 30 hours are not counted.  This, the sponsor say,  
jeopardizes the well-being and development of the student's  
children and risks the educational success of the student.

 ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    State Department of Finance  
opposes the cost of the bill.  
  
  ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  42-36, 6/3/99
AYES:  Alquist, Aroner, Bock, Calderon, Cardenas, Cardoza,  
  Cedillo, Corbett, Ducheny, Dutra, Firebaugh, Floyd,  
  Gallegos, Hertzberg, Honda, Jackson, Keeley, Knox, Kuehl,  
  Lempert, Longville, Lowenthal, Machado, Mazzoni, Migden,  
  Papan, Reyes, Romero, Scott, Shelley, Soto, Steinberg,  
  Strom-Martin, Thomson, Torlakson, Vincent, Washington,  







                                                     AB 1039
                                                       Page  
9

  Wesson, Wiggins, Wildman, Wright, Villaraigosa
NOES:  Aanestad, Ackerman, Ashburn, Baldwin, Bates, Battin,  
  Baugh, Brewer, Briggs, Campbell, Correa, Cox, Cunneen,  
  Dickerson, Florez, Frusetta, Granlund, Havice, House,  
  Kaloogian, Leach, Leonard, Maddox, Maldonado, Margett,  
  McClintock, Olberg, Oller, Robert Pacheco, Rod Pacheco,  
  Pescetti, Runner, Strickland, Thompson, Wayne, Zettel
NOT VOTING:  Davis, Nakano

CP:kb  9/9/99   Senate Floor Analyses 

               SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                      ****  END  ****