BILL ANALYSIS
AB 1127
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 26, 1999
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Carole Migden, Chairwoman
AB 1127 (Steinberg) - As Amended: May 18, 1999
Policy Committee: Labor and
Employment Vote: 6-2
Public Safety 5-3
Urgency: No State Mandated Local
Program:YesReimbursable: No
SUMMARY :
This bill increases civil and criminal penalties for violations
of the California Occupational Safety and Health Act (Cal-OSHA).
Additionally, the bill enacts specific ergonomic standards
for the prevention of repetitive motion injuries. Specifically,
this bill:
1)Increases the maximum misdemeanor sentence for knowingly or
negligently violating safety standards from six months in jail
to one year, and increases the maximum fine in such cases from
$5,000 to $200,000. If the defendant is a corporation or
limited liability company, by a fine of between $100,000 and
$1,000,000.
2)Provides that an employer who willfully violates any OSHA
standard, and that violation results in the death of any
employee, or causes permanent or prolonged impairment of the
body of any employee, is guilty of an offense punishable as a
misdemeanor or a felony (as opposed to a misdemeanor under
current law) punishable by up to one year in jail and/or a
fine of up to $250,000, 16 months, or two or three years in
state prison and/or a fine of not less than $250,000 but not
to exceed $1,000,000.
If the defendant is a corporation or limited liability company,
a fine of not less than $500,000 and not more than $5,000,000.
3)Provides that if the conviction is for a violation committed
after a first conviction for any crime involving a violation
of OSHA provisions, such offenses are punishable by two,
AB 1127
Page 2
three, or four years in state prison and/or a fine of not less
than $500,000 and not exceeding $5,000,000.
If the defendant is a corporation or limited liability company,
a fine of not less than $1,000,000 and not more than
$10,000,000.
4)Provides that a court may impose a fine for a violation of
OSHA provisions in an amount less than the minimum fine
specified if the court finds it is in the interest of justice
to do so.
5)Raises the maximum civil penalty for a serious violation of a
safety standard from $7,000 to $25,000.
6)Increases from 30 days to one year the time an employee has to
file a claim of improper discharge or discrimination against
his or her employer with the Labor Commissioner.
7)Provides that OSHA standards and orders may be admitted into
evidence in a personal injury or wrongful death action.
8)Provides that the Division of Occupational Safety and Health
may enforce, and issue citations for Labor Code violations in
addition to regulatory standards, orders, and special orders.
9)Enacts statutory requirements for the prevention of repetitive
motion injuries (RMI) in the workplace and requires the
Division and the Occupational Safety and Health Standards
Board to enforce these requirements.
FISCAL EFFECT :
No net state costs.
Minor costs for increased state incarceration, offset by fines.
Minor nonreimbursable costs for local incarceration, offset by
fines.
The bill increases the civil penalties that apply to violations
of existing health and safety standards and regulations. The
bill imposes new regulations in the area of ergonomics. The
increase in penalty revenues to the Division of Occupational
Safety and Health within the Department of Industrial Relations
AB 1127
Page 3
is likely to more than offset any increased enforcement costs
arising from this bill.
COMMENTS :
1)Background. The bill substantially increases the civil
penalties that apply to violations of health and safety
standards. The enhanced criminal penalty provisions of this
bill are drawn from AB 1015 (Knox) of 1997, which was
sponsored by the Los Angeles District Attorneys office. It
passed the Legislature and was vetoed by Governor Wilson. The
extension of the time for a worker subjected to retaliation
for complaining about unsafe working conditions to file an
administrative complaint with the Labor Commissioner was
contained in AB 2156 (Keeley) of 1998 which was passed by the
Legislature, and vetoed by Governor Wilson.
2)Purpose . Supporters argue that California's occupational
safety and health program has been weakened significantly
during the past 16 years through a series of regulations,
policies, and Appeals Board decisions that limit the
Division's ability to enforce safety and health standards.
Supporters further argue that while the majority of employers
voluntarily comply with safety requirements, the existing
penalties are too low to effectively deter those employers who
do not comply.
3)Opposition . Opponents argue that existing laws are adequate
and that this bill inappropriately increases civil and
criminal penalties and changes key provisions of current law.
They further argue that this bill will make it difficult to
hire managers and supervisors, and will have a chilling effect
on business in California.
Analysis Prepared by : Stephen Shea / APPR. / (916) 319-2081