BILL ANALYSIS
AB 1197
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 19, 1999
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Carole Migden, Chairwoman
AB 1197 (Firebaugh) - As Amended: 4/27/99
Policy Committee: Higher
EducationVote:7-4
Urgency: No State Mandated Local
Program:NoReimbursable: No
SUMMARY :
This bill QUALIFIES long-term California residents, who are not
citizens of the United States, for the lower state resident
tuition at the California Community Colleges (CCC) and the
California State University (CSU). Specifically, this bill
requires the CCC and CSU to assess residential fees to any
student who attended a high school for at least three years in
California.
FISCAL EFFECT :
Unknown GF (Prop 98) costs, potentially over $16 million to CCC,
to backfill the loss of fee revenues for non-residents, assuming
4,500 eligible students at $3,500 per pupil.
Unknown GF (non-Prop 98) costs, potentially over $12 million to
CSU, to backfill for the loss of fee revenues for non-residents,
assuming that there about 1,500 undocumented students on campus.
Non-residents tuition is $8,118.
COMMENTS :
1)Purpose . The author contends many of the students that would
benefit under this measure are children of parents who have
been granted amnesty by the federal government and are waiting
for their own applications for citizenship to be accepted by
the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS). The majority
of these students consider California their home and expect to
become citizens.
2)Background . Current law establishes residency requirements for
AB 1197
Page 2
students attending a CSU or CCC campus and requires CSU and
CCC to charge nonresident tuition to any student who is not a
California resident; furthermore, current law precludes
undocumented students from establishing residency in
California.
3)Student fees . In the current year, CSU resident students pay
$1,506 in systemwide fees, while nonresident students pay
$9,253. The amount for nonresident tuition will increase to
$9,991 in the 1999-2000 fiscal year.
4) It is not clear why this bill is silent on the University
of California.
4)Background . Current law, as noted above, was contested in a
1985 court case (" Leticia A" v. Board of Regents of the
University of California ) when a group of undocumented
students challenged UC and CSU for not recognizing them as
California residents and charging them out-of-state
(nonresident) tuition. At that time, the court ruled that
charging nonresident tuition to undocumented students was
unconstitutional because UC and CSU used a different
definition of "residency" for undocumented aliens as it used
for US citizens.
The 1985 decision was later overridden by a 1990 Court of
Appeal, Second District decision ( Regents of the University
of California v. Los Angeles County Superior Court ), also
known as the Bradford decision. In Bradford , the court held
that current law was constitutional. As a result of Bradford
, current law regarding the assessment of nonresident tuition
charges on undocumented students is being enforced at
California public colleges.
Both the Leticia A case and the Bradford case dealt solely
with the issue of defining California residency for purposes
of assessing nonresident tuition. This measure does not change
the definition of California resident nor does it alter
current law regarding the assessment of nonresident tuition to
students that are not California Residents.
Analysis Prepared by : Jai Sookprasert / APPR. / (916)
319-2081