BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       


           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 1197|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                        
                                 THIRD READING
                                        

          Bill No:  AB 1197
          Author:   Firebaugh (D), et al
          Amended:  1/4/00 in Senate
          Vote:     21

            
           SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE  :  8-5, 7/14/99
          AYES:  Alpert, Alarcon, Chesbro, Dunn, Hayden, Hughes,  
            Ortiz, Vasconcellos
          NOES:  McPherson, Haynes, Knight, Monteith, O'Connell

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  9-4, 8/23/00
          AYES:  Johnston, Alpert, Bowen, Burton, Escutia, Karnette,  
            McPherson, Perata, Vasconcellos
          NOES:  Johnson, Kelley, Leslie, Mountjoy

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  42-35, 6/4/99 - See last page for vote
           

           SUBJECT  :    Public postsecondary education:  residency

           SOURCE  :     Author

           
           DIGEST  :    This bill qualifies long-term California  
          residents, as specified, regardless of citizenship status,  
          for the lower resident fee payments at the California  
          Community Colleges and the California State University.   
          The bill would be applicable to the University of  
          California, if the Regents so decide.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law, generally known as the Uniform  
          Residency Law, establishes a variety of residency  
          requirements for students attending a campus of the  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1197
                                                                Page  
          2

          California Community Colleges or the California State  
          University.  The determination of such residency status is  
          required in order to assess either resident or non-resident  
          fees and tuition.  The Regents of the University of  
          California may, by resolution, make these provisions of law  
          applicable to the University of California (and have  
          historically done so).
          Current law also precludes students who are not in the  
          United States legally from establishing residency in  
          California for the purposes of paying resident fees and  
          tuition.  The courts have found this provision of law to be  
          constitutional, and non-resident tuition is being charged  
          of undocumented students in California public colleges and  
          universities.

          In addition, notwithstanding Proposition 187 (the  
          constitutional determination of which is still pending),  
          neither current law or the courts preclude undocumented  
          students from enrolling at a California public college or  
          university; they must nevertheless pay non-resident  
          tuition.
           
           This bill qualifies long-term California residents, as  
          specified, regardless of citizenship status, for the lower  
          resident fee payments at the California Community Colleges  
          (CCC) and the California State University (CSU).  The bill  
          would be applicable to the University of California (UC),  
          if the Regents so decide.

          The specified criteria that would have to be met by the  
          student is as follows:

          1. The student attended a California high school for at  
             least three years.

          2. The student graduated from a California high school.

          3. The student continues his or her education at a  
             California institution of higher education, within one  
             year of high school graduation or on or before January  
             1, 2001.

          4. The student must have an application or petition for  
             lawful immigration status initiated by the student.   







                                                               AB 1197
                                                                Page  
          3

             Such a petition or an application may include one in  
             which a nonresident would be a derivative beneficiary  
             (in other words, an application or petition filed by a  
             parent, for example, in which case a student would also  
             be covered).  Documentation may include one of the  
             following:

             A.   A copy of such application or petition.

             B.   Evidence from the Immigration and Naturalization  
               Service or other governmental agency, including  
               correspondence, indicating that the individual is in  
               the process of seeking immigration relief.

             C.   An affidavit from an attorney that the individual  
               is in the process of seeking immigration relief.

          1. The Regents of the University of California are  
             requested to implement the provisions as outlined above.

           Comments  :

          Need for the bill.  According to the author, many of the  
          students who would benefit under this measure are children  
          of parents who have been granted amnesty by the federal  
          government and are waiting for their own applications for  
          citizenship to be accepted by the Immigration and  
          Naturalization Service (INS).  The majority of these  
          students consider California their home and are expected to  
          become citizens.

          For many of these students, the biggest barrier to  
          attending and enrolling in college is the cost.  Under  
          federal and state law, whether or not they are  
          undocumented, students, regardless of their academic  
          achievement or financial need, are not eligible for federal  
          or state financial aid nor are they eligible to receive  
          campus-based aid or subsidized student loans.

          This measure will help qualified California high school  
          students, who cannot afford to pay nonresident tuition, to  
          afford college.  While the costs of attending CSU and UC  
          will still be difficult for many families to meet, this  
          measure takes a positive step towards ensuring that  







                                                               AB 1197
                                                                Page  
          4

          postsecondary education truly is accessible and affordable  
          for all our state's students.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          Unknown, major costs.

          Currently, nonresident tuition at CSU is $8,118 for two  
          semesters.  Resident tuition is $2,856 for two semesters  
          beginning Fall, 1999.  Nonresident tuition at CCCs is  
          $3,500.  Resident tuition is $12.00 per unit.

          It is unknown at this time how many students would be  
          affected by this bill but it appears that between 750 and  
          1,500 students may enroll in CSU under the provisions of  
          the bill.  For the purposes of estimating some fiscal  
          impact, 1,125 students paying resident tuition would  
          generate $3,213,000 annually.  The same number of students  
          paying nonresident tuition would generate $9,132,750 or a  
          difference of $5,919,750.  However, it is highly unlikely  
          the same number of students would enroll if they were  
          required to pay the nonresident tuition. 

           SUPPORT  :   (Unable to verify at time of writing)

          American Civil Liberties Union
          California Association for Bilingual Education
          California Community Colleges
          California Immigrant Welfare Collaborative
          California School Boards Association
          City of Bell Gardens
          Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles
          Community College League
          East Bay Citizenship Network
          Estrella Community Development Corporation
          Justice and Peace Commission for the Archdiocese of Los  
          Angeles
          Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund
          National Center for Youth Law
          Public Counsel Law Center
           Watts/Center Latino Organization
          Numerous individual letters








                                                               AB 1197
                                                                Page  
          5

           OPPOSITION  :    (Unable to verify at time of writing)

          American Civil Responsibilities Union, Inc.
          California Coalition for Immigration Reform
          Numerous individual letters


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :
          AYES:  Alquist, Aroner, Bock, Calderon, Cardenas, Cardoza,  
            Cedillo, Corbett, Correa, Ducheny, Dutra, Firebaugh,  
            Florez, Floyd, Gallegos, Hertzberg, Honda, Keeley, Knox,  
            Kuehl, Lempert, Longville, Lowenthal, Machado, Migden,  
            Papan, Reyes, Romero, Scott, Shelley, Soto, Steinberg,  
            Strom-Martin, Thomson, Torlakson, Vincent, Washington,  
            Wesson, Wiggins, Wildman, Wright, Villaraigosa
          NOES:  Aanestad, Ackerman, Ashburn, Baldwin, Bates, Battin,  
            Baugh, Brewer, Briggs, Campbell, Cox, Cunneen, Dickerson,  
            Frusetta, Granlund, Havice, House, Jackson, Kaloogian,  
            Leach, Leonard, Maddox, Maldonado, Margett, McClintock,  
            Olberg, Oller, Robert Pacheco, Rod Pacheco, Pescetti,  
            Runner, Strickland, Thompson, Wayne, Zettel


          NC:jk  8/26/00   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****