BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                          AB 1255
                                                          Page  1

ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
AB 1255 (Wright)
As Amended June 1, 1999
Majority vote 

  PUBLIC SAFETY       6-1         APPROPRIATIONS      18-3        
  
 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
|Ayes:|Honda, Cunneen, Battin,   |Ayes:|Migden, Battin, Cedillo,  |
|     |Keeley, Romero,           |     |Davis, Hertzberg, Kuehl,  |
|     |Washington                |     |Maldonado, Papan, Romero, |
|     |                          |     |Runner, Shelley,          |
|     |                          |     |Steinberg, Thomson,       |
|     |                          |     |Wesson, Wiggins, Wright,  |
|     |                          |     |Zettel, Aroner            |
|     |                          |     |                          |
|-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
|Nays:|Oller                     |Nays:|Brewer, Ashburn, Pescetti |
|     |                          |     |                          |
 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
  SUMMARY  :  Creates the Intensive Probation and Parole  
Intervention Partnership Act of 2000, a pilot probation program.  
 Specifically,  this bill  :

1)Allocates $6 million for the creation of a five-year intensive  
  supervised probation and parole program for the counties of  
  Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego, and Shasta. 

2)Creates a program that requires a participating offender to:

   a)   Meet personally with a probation or parole officer at  
     least once a week; and,

   b)   Participate five days per week with employment,  
     education, a job search, job training, community service,  
     counseling treatment, or a combination of these activities.

3)Authorizes an offender to be placed on electronic monitoring,  
  home detention or community service during his or her  
  participation in the program.

4)Makes an offender eligible for this program if it appears from  
  all information available to the appropriate probation or  
  parole agency that the offender would benefit from  
  participation in the program.  Public safety and offender  








                                                          AB 1255
                                                          Page  2

  accountability shall be the primary considerations. 

5)Gives priority enrollment to a youthful offender between the  
  ages of 18-25 who has a substance abuse problem.

6)Creates varying levels of supervision wherein, under the most  
  intensive supervision, a probation or parole officer may not  
  supervise more than 50 offenders at one time.  

7)Vests sole responsibility in the chief probation officer of  
  the participating county for coordinating this program and  
  contracting for all related services.

8)Authorizes the revocation of an offender's eligibility if  
  after a court hearing it is determined that the offender  
  committed an additional public offense or has otherwise  
  violated a condition of probation or parole.  

  FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
Committee analysis, this bill:

1)States legislative intent to appropriate $21 million to the  
  BOC in the 1999-2000 budget for grants to county probation  
  departments and to appropriate $6 million to the BOC to Los  
  Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego, and Shasta Counties for  
  intensive pilot programs.

2)Directs the BOC to allocate $500,000 to San Diego County for  
  development of a uniform risk model classification system for  
  probation and parole.

3)$1.5 million, contingent upon a budget appropriation, to fund  
  state parole pilot projects.

  COMMENTS  :  According to the author, "Prison conditions in  
California cannot be ignored forever.  Eventually we are going  
to have to build more space, be subject to a federal court order  
or try some alternative sentencing schemes.  AB 1255 is an  
effort to work with key stockholders and look at the best models  
available to develop alternative sentencing strategies for low  
risk offenders to both prevent some from entering the system and  
to keep others from returning as parole violations.  The cost  
savings from successful programs are obvious but we have to  
begin soon or face fiscal alternatives that are substantially  
costlier to the state in the long run."








                                                          AB 1255
                                                          Page  3


Please see the policy committee analysis for a more  
  comprehensive discussion of this bill.
  

Analysis Prepared by  :  Ignacio Hernandez / PUB.S. / (916)  
319-3744


                                                      FN: 0001635