BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    







                          SENATE COMMITTEE ON Public Safety
                             Senator John Vasconcellos, Chair   A
                                1999-2000 Regular Session       B

                                                                1
                                                                7
                                                                9
          AB 1799 (Baugh)                                       9
          As Amended March 6, 2000 
          Hearing date:  June 13, 2000
          Penal Code
          MK:mc


                    INDEMNIFICATION:  ERRONEOUSLY CONVICTED PERSONS  

                                       HISTORY


          Source:  Author

          Prior Legislation: AB 110 (Baugh) - Chapter 619, Stats. 1999

          Support: Unknown

          Opposition:None known

          Assembly Floor Vote:  Ayes 77 - Noes  0



                                         KEY ISSUE
           
          SHOULD THE AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION A PERSON RECEIVES FOR WRONGFUL  
          INCARCERATION BE INCREASED FROM A MAXIMUM OF $10,000 TO A SUM  
          EQUIVALENT TO $100 PER DAY OF INCARCERATION?

          SHOULD ANY AMOUNT RECEIVED BECAUSE OF WRONGFUL INCARCERATION BE  
          EXCLUDED FROM THE DEFINITION OF GROSS INCOME TAX FOR STATE INCOME  
          TAX PURPOSES?




                                                                     (More)






                                                            AB 1799 (Baugh)
                                                                     Page 2






                                       PURPOSE
          
          The purpose of this bill is to increase the potential  
          compensation for wrongful incarceration after a person has been  
          found factually innocent from a maximum of $10,000 to a sum  
          equivalent to $100 per day of incarceration and to exclude the  
          amount received from the definition of gross income.
           
           Existing law  provides that any person who was convicted of a  
          felony and imprisoned in the state prison who is later pardoned  
          by the Governor because the crime was not committed or the  
          person was factually innocent of the crime may present a claim  
          against the State to the State Board of Control for pecuniary  
          injury sustained by him through such erroneous conviction and  
          imprisonment.  (Penal Code  4900 et seq.)

           Existing law  provides that if the evidence shows that a crime  
          for which a claimant was convicted was either not committed at  
          all or, if committed, was not committed by the claimant, the  
          State Board of Control (BOC) shall report the facts of the case  
          and its recommendations to the Legislature for the purpose of  
          indemnifying the claimant for pecuniary injury sustained as the  
          result of the erroneous conviction and incarceration.  (Penal  
          Code  4904.)

           Existing law  provides that the amount of the appropriation  
          recommended by the BOC shall not exceed in any case, $10,000.   
          (Penal Code  4904.)

           Existing law  excludes specific items from gross income tax  
          provisions.  (Revenue and Taxation Code  17131 et seq.)

           This bill  provides that an appropriation made to a claimant who  
          has been erroneously convicted and imprisoned shall be a sum  
          equivalent to $100 per day of incarceration served subsequent to  
          the claimant's conviction.




                                                                     (More)






                                                            AB 1799 (Baugh)
                                                                     Page 3


           
           This bill  provides that an appropriation shall not be treated as  
          gross income to the recipient under Revenue and Taxation Code.

                                      COMMENTS

          1.   Need for the Bill  

          According to the author:

              There are rare instances where imprisoned individuals  
              have been found factually innocent.  Under existing law,  
              the restitution for wrongful imprisonment is limited to  
              $10,000.  Last year, in connection with AB 110 (Baugh) -  
              Chapter 619, Statutes of 1999, and the Public Safety  
              Committee recommendations, I committed to make a  
              systemic change to this procedure.  This bill would  
              remove the cap and would instead set the level of  
              recompense at $100 per day.  The $100 figure is based on  
              the amount the California Department of Corrections  
              (CDC) presently compensates those individuals who are  
              held after their scheduled release date.

          2.   No Civil Suit Available  

          When there is not clear wrongdoing or misconduct by law  
          enforcement or the district attorney, there is no civil suit  
          available to a wrongly imprisoned person.  In order to have a  
          valid civil suit a person would have to prove that the police  
          knew or should have known they were violating a constitutional  
          right of the person.  Without the civil suit option, the only  
          compensation available to a person wrongfully imprisoned are  
          statutory amounts granted by the states.  

          3.   Compensation in Other States  

          According to an American Bar Association Journal article:

              Only 16 jurisdictions have statutes to compensate the  
              wrongfully imprisoned and only two of those-New York and  




                                                                     (More)






                                                            AB 1799 (Baugh)
                                                                     Page 4


              West Virginia-do not limit damages.  Some caps on  
              compensation, such as California's, are miserly. . . .  
              New Hampshire's cap is only $20,000.  The federal system  
              is the stingiest of all, capping payments at $5,000.

              Those with the highest limits are Maine with a $300,000  
              cap, and Ohio, which awards up to $25,000 for each year  
              in prison plus lost wages, attorney fees, fines and  
              court costs.  (Higgins, Michael, "Tough Luck for the  
              Innocent Man" (March 1999) ABA Journal, at p.47.)

          According to the article, many of the other states that do place  
          limits on the compensation provide for a yearly maximum that is  
          higher than California's total maximum of $10,000.

          4.   $100 a Day  

          On October 2, 1980, in Orange County, Kevin Lee Green was  
          wrongly convicted of the 1979 murder of his unborn daughter and  
          the rape of his former wife.  Green was cleared four years ago  
          through DNA testing, which had not yet been developed at the  
          time of his conviction.  This incident gave rise to AB 110 that  
          appropriated $620,000 from the General Fund to the Department of  
          Justice (DOJ) to recompense Green for his wrongful conviction  
          and incarceration.  AB 110 used the rate of $100 per day of  
          incarceration in computing the total amount of the  
          appropriation.  This bill makes the $100 rate per day the  
          standard to be used by the BOC in making recommendations to the  
          Legislature regarding appropriations in cases of persons wrongly  
          convicted.














                                                                     (More)






                                                            AB 1799 (Baugh)
                                                                     Page 5


           
          According to the Assembly Appropriations March 6, 2000 analysis,  
          "Discussions with the CDC, the Department of Justice, the Board  
          of Control and the California District Attorneys Association  
          indicate it is unlikely there will be many applicable cases.   
          With advances in forensic DNA procedures, however, the number of  
          cases may increase.

          5.   Appropriation Exempted From Gross Income  

          This bill makes any appropriation under this section exempt from  
          the gross income tax provisions of the Revenue and Taxation  
          Code.
                          


                                   ***************