BILL ANALYSIS
SENATE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS COMMITTEE
Senator Cathie Wright, Chair
BILL NO: SCA 20 HEARING: 5/24/00
AUTHOR: Senator Don Perata FISCAL: Yes
VERSION: Amended 5/18/00 CHIEF COUNSEL: Scott
Johnson
REFERRED: Senate E & R
Vote: 3-2 (5/17/00)
LEGISLATURE: TERM LIMITS
SUMMARY
This measure revises the number of terms a senator or a
member of the Assembly may serve. SCA 20 would permit a
senator to serve three terms and an assembly member to
serve six terms.
BACKGROUND
Article IV Section 4 of the California Constitution
provides that senators shall serve no more than two terms
of four years each. Members of the Assembly shall serve no
more than three two-year terms. Those provisions for
legislative terms of office were imposed by the passage of
Proposition 140 of the 1990 general election.
Subsequently, the California Supreme Court clarified that
term limits pursuant to proposition 140 are lifetime limits
( Legislature v. Eu , 1991). Furthermore, the Federal Courts
have upheld the constitutional validity of term limits for
state office holders ( Bates v. Jones, 131 F.3d 843).
ANALYSIS
SCA 20 will amend the Constitution to provide that a state
senator may serve no more than three terms and a member of
the Assembly may serve no more than six terms. A partial
term of less than one-half of a full term does not count
toward the term limit.
The revised terms of office will apply after December 4,
2000, and terms served to that date by most legislators
would not count against the revised limits. SCA 20
provides an exception in that an incumbent senator whose
office is not on the ballot for the November 7, 2000
general election and whose term expires in 2002, shall have
his or her current term counted as the first of three terms
permitted under the proposed term limit revision.
Note: This measure pertains only to members of the
Legislature. It does not affect the two-term limit imposed
upon statewide office holders or members of the Board of
Equalization pursuant to Proposition 140.
COMMENTS
The Constitution Revision Commission recommended a similar
approach to term limits: In its 1996 final report, the
California Constitution Revision Commission recommended
that members of both houses of the legislature serve three
terms of four years each. The Commission found that
allowing longer term limits would increase the stability
and effectiveness of the Legislature, while continuing to
assure voters that members could not make careers of
legislative service. The Commission was concerned that the
current term limits do not allow enough time for
legislators to develop the expertise necessary to perform
their responsibilities effectively.
PRIOR LEGISLATION
SCA 20 is similar to SCA 35 (Maddy) of 1998, which was
approved by the Senate but was defeated in the Assembly
policy committee and ACA 21 (Papan) of 1998, which failed
passage on the Assembly floor.
This session ACA 2 (Papan) is currently pending on the
Assembly floor.
SUPPORT
California Common Cause
California Independent Public employees Legislative Council
California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO
California Medical Association
California Nurses Association
California professional Firefighters
California School Employees Association
California Retailers Association
Congress of California Seniors
League of Women Voters of California
Macy's West
Planning and Conservation League
Sierra Club California
R. William Hauck, Chairman (1994-1996)
California Constitution Revision Commission
Tony Miller, Attorney at Law
OPPOSITION
None
received