BILL ANALYSIS
------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 92|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524 | |
|(916) 445-6614 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
------------------------------------------------------------
THIRD READING
Bill No: SB 92
Author: Hayden (D)
Amended: 5/28/99
Vote: 21
SENATE INSURANCE COMMITTEE : 7-2, 4/21/99
AYES: Speier, Escutia, Figueroa, Hughes, Johnston, Schiff,
Sher
NOES: Leslie, Lewis
NOT VOTING: Johnson
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : 8-5, 5/27/99
AYES: Johnston, Alpert, Bowen, Burton, Escutia, Karnette,
Perata, Vasconcellos
NOES: Johnson, Kelley, Leslie, McPherson, Mountjoy
SUBJECT : Healthy Families Program
SOURCE : Author
DIGEST : This bill expands the Healthy Families program
(HFP), which provides health insurance coverage to
children in low-income working families. The bill:
1.Includes children who legally immigrate to the U.S. after
August 22, 1996.
2.Expands the program's definition of resident to include
children whose parents live in California and entered the
state with a job commitment or to seek employment.
CONTINUED
SB 92
Page
2
ANALYSIS :
Existing law:
1.Requires the HFP program to pay for certain services
rendered to children up to 30 days in advance of when
they enrolled in the program. Payments are limited to
providers that participate in the CHDP.
2.Requires that an applicant to HFP must be applying on
behalf of a child who meets certain requirements,
including federal citizenship and immigration
requirements, and requires that an applicant be a
"resident" as defined under Section 244 Government Code.
3.Bars program eligibility to children who entered the U.S.
after August 22, 1996, although federal law permits
states to include these children at the expense of a
state.
4.Continuously appropriates money from the HFP Fund for
purposes of implementing the program.
Related legislation :
SB 87 (Escutia), SB 107 (Polanco), SB 111 (Figueroa), SB
112 (Figueroa), SB 168 (Speier), SB 180 (Sher), AB 43
(Villaraigosa), and AB 497 (Gallegos).
Prior legislation :
SB 1398 (Hayden) and AB 1430 (Figueroa), both from the
1997-98 session. SB 1398 died in Assembly Appropriations
Committee and AB 1430 died in Senate Appropriations
Committee.
SB 92
Page
3
FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes
Local: No
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 1998-99 1999-2000
2000-01 Fund
Expansion of pre-enrollment unknown costGeneral
&
federal
New immigrant eligibility 4,900
15,000General
Residency definition unknown costGeneral
&
federal
Federal funding for recent immigrants is not now permitted,
although the President's budget proposes to allow it.
SUPPORT : (Verified 5/27/99)
Health Access California
California Immigrant Welfare Collaborative
California Nurses Association
California Association of Public Hospitals and Health
Systems
Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund
National Health Law Program, Inc.
Center for Public Interest Law, University of San Diego
Children's Advocacy Institute
California Association of Catholic Hospitals
County of Santa Barbara Kids Network
Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles
Friends Committee on Legislation of California
Interfaith Coalition for Immigrant Rights
Private Essential Access Community Hospitals
Children's Network of Solano County
Asian and Pacific Islander American Health Forum
Children's Defense Fund
JERICHO
SB 92
Page
4
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : According to the author, it is
unfair to deny a child who would otherwise qualify for HFP
access based upon an arbitrary date of entry into the U.S.
It is far more cost-effective to provide preventative care
to children than to treat them in emergency rooms, protects
the health of all children by screening for communicable
diseases, and helps children remain healthy during their
crucial growth years. The author states that the bill is
particularly important to the children of migrant farm
workers. The author also points out that California
already allows new immigrant children to be served by
Medi-Cal if they meet certain age and income requirements.
The author indicates that excluding children from HFP based
upon date of entry to the U.S. creates a perverse situation
in which some children in a family may have access to
medical care and some may not.
DLW:jk 5/29/99 Senate Floor Analyses
SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE
**** END ****