BILL ANALYSIS
------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 118|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524 | |
|(916) 445-6614 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
------------------------------------------------------------
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Bill No: SB 118
Author: Hayden (D), et al
Amended: 6/16/99
Vote: 21
SENATE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE : 4-1, 4/14/99
AYES: Alarcon, Figueroa, Karnette, Solis
NOES: Mountjoy
NOT VOTING: Haynes, Morrow
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : 8-5, 5/10/99
AYES: Johnston, Alpert, Bowen, Burton, Escutia, Karnette,
Perata, Vasconcellos
NOES: Johnson, Kelley, Leslie, McPherson, Mountjoy
SENATE FLOOR : 21-13, 5/27/99
AYES: Alarcon, Alpert, Bowen, Burton, Chesbro, Dunn,
Escutia, Figueroa, Hayden, Hughes, Johnston, Karnette,
Murray, O'Connell, Ortiz, Peace, Perata, Polanco, Sher,
Solis, Speier
NOES: Brulte, Costa, Johannessen, Kelley, Knight, Leslie,
Lewis, Monteith, Morrow, Mountjoy, Poochigian, Rainey,
Wright
NOT VOTING: Baca, Haynes, Johnson, McPherson, Schiff,
Vasconcellos
ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 41-33, 1/26/00 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT : Employment: family care and medical leave
SOURCE : Author
CONTINUED
SB 118
Page
2
DIGEST : This bill allows an employee leave to care for a
grandparent, sibling, domestic partner or an individual who
depends on the employee for immediate care and support and
who has a serious health condition.
Assembly amendments (a) delete Senate language relative to
requirement of an affidavit by an employer and the
provision relating to damages, and (b) revise the
definition of child.
ANALYSIS : Existing law makes it an unlawful employment
practice for any employer to refuse to grant a request by
any employee with more than one year of service with the
employer and who has worked at least 1,250 hours during the
previous 12-month period, to take family care and medical
leave: (1) in connection with the birth or adoption or
serious health condition of the employee's child; (2) to
care for a parent or spouse who has a serious health
condition, or; (3) because of the employee's own serious
health condition. The employer may refuse family care and
medical leave if the employer employs fewer than 50
employees within 75 miles of the employee's worksite.
Current law provides under the California Family Rights Act
(CFRA) that a "child" of the employee must be a minor under
18 years of age or an adult dependent.
This bill provides that an employee may take family care
and medical leave to care for a grandparent, sibling,
domestic partner or an individual who depends on the
employee for immediate care and support, who shares a
common residence with the employee, and who has a serious
health condition.
The bill defines "domestic partners" to mean two adult
persons in a committed relationship of mutual caring where
all of the following conditions apply:
(a)Both persons share a common residence.
(b)Both persons agree to be responsible for each other's
basic living expenses during the domestic partnership.
SB 118
Page
3
(c)Neither person is married or a member of another
domestic partnership.
(d)Both persons are at least 18 years of age.
(e)Both persons file a Declaration of Domestic Partnership
with the employer.
The bill permits an employee to utilize leave under the
CFRA for care of any adult child, by removing the
limitation that an adult child be a dependent.
Prior Legislation
SB 1506 (Hayden), 1998 (failed passage on the Senate
Floor).
FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes
Local: No
No state costs. According to the Department of Personnel
Administration, state law already allows such leaves at the
discretion of the appointing authority. Department of
Personnel Administration also reports that existing
collective bargaining agreements with the state provide
this benefit.
SUPPORT : (Verified 5/25/99) (Unable to reverify Support
and Opposition at time of writing)
AIDS Project Los Angeles
American Cancer Society
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
California Alliance for Pride and Equality (CAPE)
California Association for the Education of Young Children
(CAEYC)
California Catholic Conference
California Church
California Conference Board of the Amalgamated Transit
Union
California Conference of Machinists
California Federation of Business and Professional Women
California Independent Public Employees Legislative Council
SB 118
Page
4
California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO
California Professional Firefighters (CPF)
California School Employees Association
California State Association of Electrical Workers
California State Pipe Trades Council
California Teachers Association
California Teamsters Public Affairs Council
Coalition of University Employees (CUE)
Communication Workers of America, District 9, AFL-CIO
E.J. Oshins
Election Committee of the County of Orange (ECCO)
Employment Law Center, Legal Aid Society of San Francisco
Engineers and Scientists of California, Local 20 IFPTE,
AFL-CIO
Equal Rights Advocates
Friends Committee on Legislation of California (FCL)
Gay and Lesbian Center
Hotel Employees, Restaurant Employees International Union,
AFL-CIO
Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Center
Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG)
Pilgrim Congregational Church/Rev. Ann R. Lougee
Region 8 State Council of the United Food and Commercial
Workers
Rolling Hills United Methodist Church
Tower Records
United Teachers of Los Angeles (UTLA)
Western State Council of Sheet metal Workers
Westin Bonaventure Hotel and Suites, Los Angeles County
129 individual letters
OPPOSITION : (Verified 5/25/99)
Burkleo Roofing, Inc.
California Chamber of Commerce
California Manufacturers Association
Committee on Moral Concerns
DJB Liberty, Inc.
Gray Lift, Inc.
Heritage Estates, Inc.
Loar Ward Property Appraiser
N/S Corporation
New Life Christian School
Pacific Towing
SB 118
Page
5
The Sound Company
Tubular Specialties Mfg., Inc.
Valley Paper and Packing, Inc.
Department of Finance
12 individual letters
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : According to the author and
supporters of this bill, under current law, unmarried
spouses, siblings, and others who are primary caregivers
are precluded from taking unpaid leave to provide care.
Many families' caregiving needs are now being met by family
members who also are holding down jobs. This has fueled
the rising need among employees for workplace policies that
unable them to meet the often competing needs of job and
home. Without the availability of job-protected family and
medical leave, employees often face the difficult choice of
returning to work prematurely, or giving up their jobs or
of not providing their families the care and support they
need. This bill corrects the inequity of excluding
domestic partners, siblings, and others who are primary
caregivers from the family and medical leave law.
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION : The California Manufacturers
Association states that the bill is overly broad and is
subject to abuse by employees and would lead to increased
litigation.
The Committee on Moral Concerns argues that "employers
should not be forced into the expense and inconvenience of
accommodating employees' non-legal relationships of
convenience. The historical family arrangement works best
for society. Struggling families do not need their tax
burden increased or their wages or benefits cut to support
employee's adult friends."
ASSEMBLY FLOOR :
AYES: Alquist, Aroner, Bock, Calderon, Cardenas, Cedillo,
Corbett, Cunneen, Davis, Ducheny, Dutra, Firebaugh,
Gallegos, Havice, Hertzberg, Jackson, Keeley, Knox,
Kuehl, Lempert, Longville, Lowenthal, Mazzoni, Migden,
Nakano, Papan, Romero, Scott, Shelley, Soto, Steinberg,
Strom-Martin, Thomson, Torlakson, Vincent, Washington,
Wayne, Wesson, Wiggins, Wildman, Villaraigosa
NOES: Aanestad, Baldwin, Bates, Battin, Baugh, Brewer,
SB 118
Page
6
Briggs, Campbell, Cardoza, Cox, Dickerson, Florez,
Frusetta, Granlund, House, Kaloogian, Leach, Leonard,
Maddox, Maldonado, Margett, McClintock, Olberg, Oller,
Robert Pacheco, Rod Pacheco, Pescetti, Reyes, Runner,
Strickland, Thompson, Wright, Zettel
NOT VOTING: Ackerman, Ashburn, Correa, Floyd, Honda,
Machado
NC:sl 1/27/00 Senate Floor Analyses
SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE
**** END ****