BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 128
                                                                  Page  1

          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 128 (Polanco)
          As Amended August 29, 2000
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :Vote not relevant  
           
           PUBLIC SAFETY                   APPROPRIATIONS    14-7          
                         (vote not relevant)
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |     |                          |Ayes:|Migden, Cedillo, Davis,   |
          |     |                          |     |Hertzberg, Kuehl, Papan,  |
          |     |                          |     |Romero, Shelley,          |
          |     |                          |     |Steinberg, Thomson,       |
          |     |                          |     |Wesson, Wiggins, Wright,  |
          |     |                          |     |Longville                 |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |Nays:|Brewer, Ackerman,         |
          |     |                          |     |Ashburn, Battin,          |
          |     |                          |     |Maldonado, Runner, Zettel |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           CONSUMER PROTECTION    6-0                                      
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Davis, Leach, Correa,     |     |                          |
          |     |Cox, Lempert, Machado     |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :   Authorizes the Director of the Department of General  
          Services (DGS) to declare as surplus a Department of  
          Transportation (Caltrans) building in Los Angeles and allows  
          wrap-up insurance to be applied on a program basis, instead of  
          on a project basis.  Specifically,  this bill  :   

          1)Authorizes DGS, with approval of the Director of Caltrans, to  
            sell, lease, or exchange real property located at 120 South  
            Spring Street in Los Angeles, including structures thereon  
            totaling approximately 395,000 square feet on terms and  
            conditions that are in the best interest of the state.  
            (Estimated value:  Approximately $1 million)

          2)Allows a state or local governmental agency to use  








                                                                  SB 128
                                                                  Page  2

            owner-controlled or wrap-up insurance with regard to a  
            construction or renovation program (instead of project) that  
            costs greater than $50 million if the agency meets specified  
            conditions.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Requires each state agency to annually review all proprietary  
            state lands over which it has jurisdiction and report any  
            surplus property to DGS, according to specific criteria.   

          2)Requires DGS to request authorization by the Legislature prior  
            to disposing by sale or otherwise any surplus property.

          3)Requires state agencies, when purchasing real property, to  
            review the Surplus Property Inventory and purchase, lease or  
            trade property on that list if possible.

          4)Allows a state or local governmental agency to use  
            owner-controlled or wrap-up insurance with regard to a  
            construction or renovation  project that costs greater than  
            $50 million if the agency meets specified conditions.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author's office, this bill is needed  
          in order to declare surplus a Caltrans building in Los Angeles  
          and to eliminate confusion about the use of owner-controlled or  
          wrap-up insurance.  The building in question is too small for  
          the Caltrans District Office and reportedly has some seismic  
          safety issues.  It is being declared surplus in order to clear  
          the way for a possible deal with the City of Los Angeles,  
          whereby the City would turn the site into a park in exchange for  
          a larger building to be utilized by Caltrans. 

          SB 981 (Polanco), Chapter 521, Statutes of 1999, established the  
          parameters for the use of owner-controlled or wrap-up insurance.  
           This insurance is applicable to large public works construction  
          projects.  The government entity, or "owner", can provide a  
          single policy to cover all its insurance needs including workers  
          compensation and liability insurance for all entities involved  
          in the project.  Since the passage of that legislation,  
          questions have been raised about whether the authority can be  
          used for multiple sites within a renovation or construction  
          program or for single projects only.  








                                                                  SB 128
                                                                  Page  3


          For example, Sacramento City Unified School District is putting  
          in air conditioning in each of its schools.  Without this  
          change, the district is unclear whether they can get a single  
          wrap-up insurance policy to cover the multiple contractors at  
          multiple sites.  Obtaining this insurance will be much easier to  
          administer and save money.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Janice Cooper / CONPRO / (916) 319-2089  




                                                                FN: 0007202