BILL ANALYSIS
SB 218
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 25, 1999
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Carole Migden, Chairwoman
SB 218 (Solis) - As Amended: August 19, 1999
Policy Committee: Public
SafetyVote: 8-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local
Program:YesReimbursable: Yes
SUMMARY :
This bill makes a series of several changes to domestic violence
law, including requiring, rather than authorizing, courts to
seize guns from persons subject to domestic violence protective
orders. Specifically, this bill:
1)Makes a series of changes to state law regarding ownership or
possession of guns by a person under domestic violence
protective order (DVPO):
a) Enacts an automatic prohibition from owning or
possessing a gun by deleting the requirement of a separate
court order.
b) Limits judicial discretion to modify an order requiring
that a person subject to a DVPO relinquish all guns for the
duration of the order. Clarifies existing law prohibiting
owning or possessing a gun while a DVPO is in effect.
c) Requires the court to inform the respondent of a
protective order that the respondent is prohibited from
owing or possessing a gun.
2)Increases mandatory minimum jail terms for certain repeat
offenders granted probation:
a) One prior conviction within 7 years for a specified
domestic violence offense: from 96 hours to 15 days.
b) Two prior convictions within 7 years: from 30 days to 60
days.
SB 218
Page 2
c) Retains the provision of current law in this section
that allows the court to not impose the mandatory
punishment upon a showing of good cause.
3)Permits courts to issue unofficial translations of orders or
documents issued pursuant to the Domestic Violence Prevention
Act, and directs the Judicial Council to prepare forms that
relate to domestic violence prevention in languages other than
English.
4)Requires batterer's treatment programs to be approved by the
probation department.
5)Expands grounds for contempt of court to include willfully
disobeying of an out-of-state court order issued to a party
alleging domestic violence and knowingly possessing a gun in
violation of a protective order, as specified.
6)Requires an officer to make an arrest, with or without a
warrant, when responding to a call alleging a violation of a
DVPO, whether or not the violation occurred in the presence of
the officer, and requires law enforcement to seize a gun or
other deadly weapon.
7)Removes the sunset on the advisory council to the Department
of Health Services, Maternal and Child Health Branch's grant
program to fund domestic violence shelters and services for
victims of domestic violence.
8)Allows members of a county interagency domestic violence death
review team to share confidential or privileged information,
or information that is prohibited from disclosure by statute,
regarding the victim, with other appointed members and
establishes uniform reporting criteria for domestic violence
death review teams.
FISCAL EFFECT
1)Unknown, probably minor costs for additional state prison
commitments.
2)Minor reimbursable local costs to probation departments to
approve batterer's treatment programs.
COMMENT
SB 218
Page 3
Rationale . Current law prohibits a person restrained by a DVPO
from purchasing a gun, but does not currently incorporate other
restrictions contained in federal law. This bill conforms
California law to federal law by prohibiting a person restrained
by a DVPO from owning or possessing a gun for the term of the
DVPO. This bill also requires law enforcement to remove any
firearms at the scene of a domestic violence incident or any
firearms found after a consensual search.
Courts may order a perpetrator of domestic violence to attend
counseling, but there are no minimum standards in statute
regarding the quality or duration of the counseling. This bill
requires batterer's treatment programs to be approved by the
county probation department pursuant to detailed standards set
out in the Penal Code.
Analysis Prepared by : Geoff Long / APPR. / (916)319-2081