BILL ANALYSIS
Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
------------------------------------------------------------
| |SB 254 (Speier) |
|-------------------------------+----------------------------|
| | |
|-------------------------------+----------------------------|
|Hearing Date: 5/27/99 |Amended: 5/18/99 |
|-------------------------------+----------------------------|
|Consultant: David |Policy Vote: Insurance 6-1 |
|Maxwell-Jolly | |
| |Judic. 6-3 |
| | |
------------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________________
BILL SUMMARY: SB 254 requires the Department of
Corporations to establish the Independent Medical Review
System which would be available for review of any plan
decision denying, delaying, limiting, or terminating health
care covered by the plan. Any enrollee, including a
Medi-Cal enrollee or, unless expressly preempted by federal
law, a Medicare enrollee, may apply for an independent
medical review. The bill also revises the statutory
grievance process to shorten the time period the enrollee
must pursue remedies under the process before being able to
file a complaint with the department.
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02 Fund
Independent review system unknown cost offset by feesCorp.
State employee heath benefits unknown cost General &
Other
Medi-Cal managed care plans unknown cost General &
federal
STAFF COMMENTS: SUSPENSE FILE
The bill authorizes health plan assessment to cover the
cost of the independent review system. The bill provisions
that result in direct state cost include:
Shortens from 60 to 30 the time by which a plan must
respond to "grievances." Shortening this time could
result in more complaints being referred to the state
because the state does not take complaints until the
existing 60 day period has expired.
Shortness from 60 to 30 days the requirement for the
department to review pending grievances and explain why
the grievance is still pending.
Potential costs for the contract with the accrediting
organization.
Audit of independent review decisions.
Independent evaluation.
SB 189, on today's agenda, also establishes an independent
review system. The two bills differ in several ways:
1.The situations when independent review is allowed,
2.Standards for the admissibility of the reviewer's
findings in later proceedings,
3.The criteria for determining medical necessity,
4.The timing of the review, and
5.The Department of Corporation's role in making a
preliminary review of the request for independent review.