BILL ANALYSIS
SENATE HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
COMMITTEE ANALYSIS
Senator Martha M. Escutia, Chair
BILL NO: SB 848
S
AUTHOR: Vasconcellos
B
AMENDED: As introduced
HEARING DATE: April 7, 1999
8
FISCAL: Appropriations
4
8
CONSULTANT:
Miller
Continued---
STAFF ANALYSIS OF SENATE BILL 848 (VASCONCELLOS) Page
2
SUBJECT
Medicinal marijuana distribution
SUMMARY
Directs the state to develop and implement a plan for the
safe and affordable distribution of medicinal marijuana.
ABSTRACT
Existing law, the Compassionate Use Act of 1986, prohibits
a physician from being prosecuted for recommending
marijuana for medicinal purposes. The Act further directs
the Legislature to establish a legal means of distributing
marijuana to patients. The Compassionate Use Act was
created by popular initiative, Proposition 215, in November
1996. Federal law on possession or distribution of
marijuana conflicts with this statute.
This bill:
1.Finds federal and state law enforcement policy in
conflict with public intent of safe distribution of
medicinal marijuana; finds lack of a distribution system
injurious to many patients; states obligation of public
officials to implement the law and declares legislative
intent to plan for distribution of medical marijuana.
2.Directs the state to develop and implement a plan for the
safe and affordable distribution of medical marijuana.
FISCAL IMPACT
Undetermined. Costs associated with policy development and
potential costs for distribution development, presumably
offset by consumer reimbursement.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Proposition 215, adopted by California voters in 1996,
directed the Legislature to design and implement a means of
distributing medical marijuana to California patients who
STAFF ANALYSIS OF SENATE BILL 848 (VASCONCELLOS) Page
3
might benefit from the product. Several attempts by the
author to realize this intent were defeated or vetoed (SB
535, 1997, Vasconcellos, et. al.) and resistance by both
state and federal authorities prevented any public
distribution. Numerous private, local distribution
organizations attempted to obtain and deliver marijuana for
medical purposes, but were forced to close due to police
and judicial action. A number of California cities either
encouraged or openly tolerated marijuana distribution, but
no broad distribution has been realized.
The current Attorney General has created a special task
force to design a public distribution system and has
appointed the author as chair of the effort. This measure
is intended to implement the recommendations of the task
force once they are developed. The recommendations may be
completed by early spring of this year.
Opponents object to the distribution of marijuana in its
naturally occurring state and seek, rather, the medical use
of its component, chemical constituents. Opponents believe
"non-smokable" cannibis in suppositories, pills or liquids
is preferable for both health and psycho-social reasons.
POSITIONS
Support: Americans for Medical Rights
California Department of Justice
Friends Committee on Legislation
San Francisco AIDS Foundation
Oppose: Committee on Moral Concerns
Cannabis Pharmaceutical Coalition (unless
amended)
-- END --