BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                          SB 848
                                                          Page  1

SENATE THIRD READING
SB 848 (Vasconcellos)
As Amended August 16, 1999
Majority vote 

  SENATE VOTE  :21-12


  HEALTH              9-4         APPROPRIATIONS      14-7        
  
 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
|Ayes:|Gallegos, Aanestad,       |Ayes:|Migden, Cedillo, Davis,   |
|     |Corbett, Firebaugh,       |     |Hertzberg, Kuehl, Papan,  |
|     |Kuehl, Steinberg,         |     |Romero, Keeley,           |
|     |Thomson, Vincent, Wildman |     |Steinberg, Thomson,       |
|     |                          |     |Wesson, Wiggins, Wright,  |
|     |                          |     |Aroner                    |
|     |                          |     |                          |
|-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
|Nays:|Strickland, Bates,        |Nays:|Brewer, Ackerman,         |
|     |Runner, Wayne             |     |Ashburn, Campbell,        |
|     |                          |     |Maldonado, Runner, Zettel |
|     |                          |     |                          |
 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
  SUMMARY  :  Establishes a voluntary statewide medical marijuana  
Registration Identification Card (RIC) Program administered by  
the Department of Health Services (DHS).  Specifically,  this  
bill  :

1)Makes findings and declarations related to the medical use of  
  marijuana.  States the intent of the Legislature to clarify  
  the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 (Act), as specified.

2)Defines "qualified patient (QP)," "person with a RIC (PRC),"  
  "attending physician," "primary caregiver," and "serious  
  medical condition" for the purposes of this bill.

3)Requires DHS to establish and maintain a voluntary program for  
  the issuance of RICs to QPs and primary caregivers, as  
  specified.  Requires DHS to develop protocols and application  
  forms for use by county health departments.  Requires DHS to  
  maintain program records, as specified.  Authorizes DHS to  
  establish an application and renewal fee, as specified.

4)Requires every county health department to utilize protocols  








                                                          SB 848
                                                          Page  2

  developed by DHS, as specified to: a) provide, receive and  
  process RIC applications, as specified; b) maintain records of  
  the RIC Program, as specified; c) transmit application  
  information to DHS, as specified; d) send renewal notices to  
  PRCs and/or primary caregivers, as specified; and, e) submit  
  an annual report to DHS, as specified.  Authorizes the county  
  health department to designate another entity, as specified,  
  to perform specified functions.

5)Makes specified requirements of an applicant to acquire and  
  renew a RIC.

6)Specifies that a RIC is not necessary to claim the protections  
  of the Act.  Provides that no person or primary caregiver with  
  a RIC shall be subject to arrest for possession,  
  transportation, delivery or cultivation of medical marijuana  
  in an amount approved by DHS, as specified.  Requires state  
  and local law enforcement officials to accept RICs issued by  
  DHS, as specified.  Specifies that a PRC, a primary caregiver  
  or other person, as specified, shall not be subject to  
  criminal liability based solely on conforming to this bill.   
  States this bill does not authorize an individual to smoke or  
  consume marijuana unless otherwise authorized by the Act.   
  Specifies that a primary caregiver or other person, as  
  specified, who receives reasonable compensation for services  
  or expenses, is not subject to criminal liability based solely  
  on conforming to this bill.

7)Authorizes specified individuals to associate or incorporate,  
  as specified, to cultivate marijuana for medical purposes in  
  accordance with DHS regulations, as specified.

8)States this bill shall not require any accommodation of  
  medical marijuana on the premises of any place of employment  
  or any correctional facility, as specified.  Prohibits the  
  smoking of medical marijuana in any place where smoking is  
  prohibited by law, and other specified locations.

9)Provides that an incarcerated person shall not be prohibited  
  from applying for a RIC and authorizes a correctional facility  
  to permit an incarcerated PRC to use medical marijuana, as  
  specified.  Provides with respect to the conditions of  
  probation, parole or bail, the burden of proof shall be on the  
  recipient to show that use of medical marijuana should not be  
  included in the conditions.  Requires the court to consider  








                                                          SB 848
                                                          Page  3

  the proof and to provide a written record describing the  
  reason for denial of the request.

10)Provides that no governmental, private, or any other health  
  care service plan or insurer shall be liable for any claim for  
  reimbursement for medical marijuana.

11)Prohibits a professional licensing board from taking any  
  disciplinary action against a licensee based solely on  
  conformance with the requirements of this bill, as specified.

12)Provides that records kept in accordance with this bill are  
  confidential and not subject to public disclosure and requires  
  information to be transmitted to the California Law  
  Enforcement Telecommunications System, as specified.  Provides  
  punishment for fraud or breach of confidentiality associated  
  with this bill, as specified.

13)Provides that any provision of this bill may be deemed  
  separate, distinct and independent.

  EXISTING LAW  prohibits any physician from being punished for  
having recommended marijuana to a patient for medical purposes.   
The Act prohibits the provisions of law making unlawful the  
possession or cultivation of marijuana from applying to a  
patient, or to a patient' s primary caregiver, who possesses or  
cultivates marijuana for the personal medical purposes of the  
patient upon the recommendation or approval of a physician.  The  
Act further directs the Legislature to establish a legal means  
of distributing marijuana to patients.  Federal law on  
possession or distribution of marijuana conflicts with the Act.

  FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
Committee analysis, annual state administration costs in the  
range of $2.5 million and annual costs to local health  
departments, probably in the range of $3 million to $5 million.   
This bill provides for the reimbursement of all state and local  
government costs through fees charged to applicants (special  
fund, local funds).

  COMMENTS  :  This bill establishes a mechanism (i.e., a wallet  
card or RIC) which provides a county and state-approved  
presumption that PRC or primary caregiver is not in violation of  
existing drug laws.  This presumption would potentially be  
useful in a situation in which a person is questioned by a law  








                                                          SB 848
                                                          Page  4

enforcement officer regarding the use of marijuana.  In fact,  
the main beneficiaries of this bill will be California's law  
enforcement who will see a reduction in time and energy spent  
dealing with situations involving marijuana usage, possession,  
transportation and cultivation, as the mechanism established by  
this bill will provide an almost instantaneous evaluation of  
whether or not a crime is being committed.  This bill does not  
further establish any rights regarding medical marijuana that  
are not already established by Proposition 215.  Attorney  
General Bill Lockyer has created a special task force to design  
a public distribution system and has appointed the author as  
chair of the effort.  This bill implements the recommendations  
of the task force.  The Consumer Federation of California (CFC)  
supports this bill stating that although reasonable minds may  
differ on the morality of medical marijuana, California voters  
approved [the Act] to ensure that seriously ill persons have the  
right to obtain and use marijuana when a health care provider  
determines the person would derive benefits from its use.  CFC  
states this bill responds to the will of the voters by providing  
a method of safe and affordable distribution that comports with  
the intent of Proposition 215.  

Californians for Compassionate Use (CCU) write in opposition to  
this bill stating that it is a veiled attempt to circumnavigate  
the will of the people under the guise of protecting patients,  
solely to appease law enforcement and that this bill will create  
58 county bureaucracies.  The Committee on Moral Concerns (CMC)  
also writes in opposition stating the latest marijuana research  
(Institute of Medicine [IOM] Report) does not advocate  
legalizing medical marijuana or distributing it.  CMC states the  
IOM report limits its recommendations to patients who are  
terminally ill or who have symptoms that don't respond to other  
medications, and that current California law is already much  
more lenient than the IOM recommendations. 


  Analysis Prepared by  :  Ellen McCormick / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097  


                                                       FN:  
0002939