BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       


           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  SB 1348|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                        
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS
                                        

          Bill No:  SB 1348
          Author:   Vasconcellos (D)
          Amended:  8/29/00
          Vote:     21

            
           SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE  :  10-3, 4/26/00
          AYES:  Alpert, McPherson, Alarcon, Chesbro, Dunn, Hayden,  
            O'Connell, Ortiz, Sher, Vasconcellos
          NOES:  Haynes, Knight, Monteith

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  9-2, 5/25/00
          AYES:  Johnston, Alpert, Bowen, Burton, Escutia, Karnette,  
            McPherson, Perata, Vasconcellos
          NOES:  Leslie, Mountjoy

           SENATE FLOOR  :  26-13, 5/31/00
          AYES:  Alarcon, Alpert, Bowen, Burton, Chesbro, Costa,  
            Dunn, Escutia, Figueroa, Hayden, Hughes, Johnston,  
            Karnette, McPherson, Murray, O'Connell, Ortiz, Peace,  
            Perata, Polanco, Schiff, Sher, Solis, Soto, Speier,  
            Vasconcellos
          NOES:  Brulte, Haynes, Johannessen, Kelley, Knight, Leslie,  
            Lewis, Monteith, Morrow, Mountjoy, Poochigian, Rainey,  
            Wright

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  43-29, 8/31/00 - See last page for vote
           

           SUBJECT  :    Parenting education

           SOURCE  :     Author

           
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1348
                                                                Page  
          2

           DIGEST  :    This bill proposes to convene a top level  
          statewide summit to determine whether the state should  
          develop a master plan for parenting education in nonschool  
          settings.

           Assembly Amendments  substantially change the bill.  As it  
          left the Senate, the bill required the State Department of  
          Health Services to convene a summit to develop a master  
          plan for parenting education in nonpublic school settings.

           ANALYSIS  :    This bill requires the Superintendent of  
          Public Instruction (SPI) to design, in consultation with  
          the Secretary of Education, to submit for consideration,  
          possible revision and approval, to the State Board of  
          Education (SBE), a proposal to convene a summit, on or  
          about September 1, 2001, for the purpose of assessing  
          whether it would be smart and wise for the State of  
          California to develop a master plan for parenting education  
          in nonschool settings, as specified, and to submit these  
          findings to the Legislature on or before January 1, 2002.   
          Specifically, this bill:

          1.Makes various findings and declarations that the failure  
            to prepare young Californians to make informed, wise  
            choices regarding whether to become, and how to be good,  
            healthy, and effective parents results in too many unwise  
            choices and too little healthy parenting for the next  
            generation of Californians and that the State must  
            recognize, encourage, and build upon, rather than  
            duplicate, the effective and available parenting  
            education programs.

          2.States legislative intent that the state convene a top  
            level statewide summit to determine whether parenting  
            education should be provided to every young Californian  
            and, if so, to design for submission to the Legislature  
            for its consideration, a comprehensive strategic action  
            plan for ensuring that every young Californian gain the  
            benefit of parenting education, in hopes of fostering the  
            development of healthier patents, and thereby healthier  
            families, children and adults.

          3.Requires the SPI to design, in consultation with the  
            Secretary for Education, to submit for consideration  







                                                               SB 1348
                                                                Page  
          3

            possible revision, and approval to SBE, a proposal to  
            convene a summit, on or about September 1, 2001, for the  
            purpose of assessing whether it would be smart and wise  
            for the State of California to develop a master plan for  
            education in nonschool settings.  Further requires that  
            upon the approval of the proposal, the SPI will convene  
            and conduct the parenting education summit pursuant to  
            the approved plans.

          4.Requires the summit to include interested parties of all  
            ideologies and persuasions, legislative experts in  
            parenting issues, representatives of current providers,  
            academic experts, business leaders, family and child  
            development experts, faith leaders, health professionals,  
            experts in public school parenting education programs,  
            parents, and children.

          5.Requires participation from the SPI, the Chairperson of  
            the SBE, the Secretary of Education, the State Department  
            of Health Services, the State Department of Mental  
            Health, the State Department of Alcohol and Drug  
            Programs, the State Department of the Youth Authority,  
            the Board of Corrections and the Attorney General in the  
            summit, as specified.

          6.Requires that the summit have a variety of objectives,  
            including compiling an inventory of all parenting  
            education programs, the development of a method by which  
            parents of newborns may receive parenting education,  
            identification of licensed professionals who would be the  
            most appropriate educators, the creation of a means for  
            coordinating parenting education services, in  
            consultation with the State Department of Education  
            (SDE), the identification of the ways for developing  
            funding for the various options for parenting education,  
            and identification and development of additional methods  
            by which each of the state departments participating in  
            this summit can ensure that Californians receive  
            effective and useful parenting education, as specified.

          7.Requires the SPI, in consultation with Secretary of  
            Education, prepare a report and submit it to SBE, as  
            specified.  Further requires that the report then be  
            submitted to the Legislature on or before January 1,  







                                                               SB 1348
                                                                Page  
          4

            2002.

          8.Requires SDE to make every reasonable effort to secure  
            private funding to underwrite the cost of this summit.   
            Specifies that SDE is not responsible for travel costs  
            and per diem associated with this summit for any  
            participant, except when required by state law or  
            administrative policy.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Alquist, Aroner, Bock, Calderon, Cardenas, Cedillo,  
            Corbett, Correa, Ducheny, Dutra, Firebaugh, Floyd,  
            Gallegos, Havice, Honda, Jackson, Keeley, Knox, Kuehl,  
            Lempert, Longville, Lowenthal, Machado, Mazzoni, Migden,  
            Nakano, Reyes, Romero, Scott, Shelley, Steinberg,  
            Strom-Martin, Thomson, Torlakson, Villaraigosa, Vincent,  
            Washington, Wayne, Wesson, Wiggins, Wildman, Wright,  
            Hertzberg
          NOES:  Aanestad, Ackerman, Ashburn, Baldwin, Bates, Battin,  
            Baugh, Brewer, Briggs, Campbell, Cox, Dickerson, Florez,  
            House, Kaloogian, Leach, Leonard, Maddox, Maldonado,  
            Margett, McClintock, Olberg, Robert Pacheco, Rod Pacheco,  
            Pescetti, Runner, Strickland, Thompson, Zettel


          NC:sl  9/12/00   Senate Floor Analyses 

                       SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  NONE RECEIVED

                                ****  END  ****